delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Authority-Analysis: | v=2.0 cv=d9t3OGfE c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=M_ffKnrP7SkA:10 a=wZ22qzirHPMA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=0S8s51K_AAAA:8 a=WS0wvFspJICfaiDUqQUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=c12d3Yiv1XMA:10 a=X_R2HHJIuKkA:10 a=n6kTumpy3E0A:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117 |
X-Cloudmark-Score: | 0 |
X-Originating-IP: | 70.113.67.117 |
Message-ID: | <4F689C1D.9050008@ecosensory.com> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:02:53 -0500 |
From: | John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Pollution of gedasymbols |
References: | <1332246519 DOT 2657 DOT 14 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <20120320065951 DOT 7eed976f AT svelte> |
In-Reply-To: | <20120320065951.7eed976f@svelte> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
On 03/20/2012 08:59 AM, Colin D Bennett wrote: > I have found that leaning toward being excessively verbose with > symbol/footprint naming is the way to go. Yes, John Luciani's naming scheme, (see http://luciani.org/geda/geda-index.html), is a good model.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |