delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=xQn0Reeqk7xm6Q39b3QvsfvbFcoDy/cKoz0RE7yctsY=; | |
b=dStYKoQzz8ebBi4p/QokY1FYktlogs89OqM/LV4yodCTkkwHuAFYMuR1mD8bRVeS9b | |
pGMB+gCknDv4qZNag/YKmoWTNKrPiZUNxYeCKF8HIhBShSg62KEtCOgx0C6kN82hBLSW | |
8XpNTCKzGlCGSghCUll6+yTTMrsMEuOPD+plTcREcCcubRJdf4WSIbiQTzaFRFA83u31 | |
9fGjVr1G+sOSJLrjtOZ6m11dWnnpkvsg0mt+L7OeMNhgw1ZKQh2ES+YdPBeLqwJguC3o | |
eYGKQntH82pWv0WuYLNZbyNuV214ZpkX2CHwgZuKVwlOAmDMNTT+FetC+X6yy3cNAdQa | |
X8Hw== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CACPio-7f0aAH5iF9KHkpVB2EpCFj+NefQ8XXKHN7a1cgAqRaOA@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CACPio-6438uNhTCPB8bi_ROtAaudBWO2nWUwms6U-+LS=jh3Cw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<4F67BB67 DOT 1030004 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
<CACPio-7f0aAH5iF9KHkpVB2EpCFj+NefQ8XXKHN7a1cgAqRaOA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:29:11 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CACPio-7kELU074THHmC7VsOU8eXvkoCWB9g9-DYndi_du7uT2g@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] repetitive circuits |
From: | Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q2K1TGtu028377 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
engineering choices aside - I guess the question remains - as I have 2x quad switches in the same circuit, so sidestepping the assignment by changing parts only adds another turtle to the stack of them holding up the earth. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > Thanks - I saw the bit about hierarchical schematics but missed the > bit about being able to use them multiple times. What about refdes > incrementing and assignment? Right now I've got my filter laid out so > that there are 6 channels, each using 2 channels of a quad opamp. I > guess it's probably better to either draw it as 3x dual channel > filters, or else swtich to dual opamps. I'm not really space > constrained, might be easier to lay out anyway. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:04 PM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote: >> On 03/19/2012 10:28 AM, Nathan Stewart wrote: >>> >>> In gschem, Is there any way to cleanly represent repetitive circuit >>> segments without drawing the same circuit n times, but so that it will >>> still import correctly into PCB? >> >> >> Have you gotten along at hierarchic schematics? There are some >> tools I use here: http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/john_griessen/ >> http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/john_griessen/tools/pcb-hier-cells >> >> I can send you an example project to look at and maybe you will use the >> project dir method as a model. My project dirs include necessary config >> files so that >> gschem uses local libraries in them.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |