X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	ham02.websitewelcome.com
X-Spam-Flag2999:	NO
X-Spam-Level2999:
X-Spam-Status2999:	"No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gibibit.com;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BWhitelist:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir:X-Source-Sender:X-Source-Auth:X-Email-Count:X-Source-Cap;
	b=a5WdtACyO+JrVUDyu2iCz2d6A7X9LVC3r5waVweTClM/d84HZ8fTcNPFTpKMZAQKHAq2R9QMhI1p49L7iajOx3m9/WSCjo9FiQczBD6d++BkLmhjR9KyidWQCvwkI86S;
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2012 22:52:08 -0800
From:	Colin D Bennett <colin AT gibibit DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Text formatting
Message-ID:	<20120309225208.3c1a07a7@svelte>
In-Reply-To:	<1331342109.2533.48.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
References:	<1331337138 DOT 10630 DOT 1 AT kwak>
	<1331339779 DOT 2533 DOT 43 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<20120309165553 DOT 727c8400 AT svelte>
	<1331342109 DOT 2533 DOT 48 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com
X-BWhitelist:	no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender:	c-24-16-114-89.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (svelte) [24.16.114.89]:53506
X-Source-Auth:	colin AT gibibit DOT com
X-Email-Count:	1
X-Source-Cap:	c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q2A6qDCG031535
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:15:09 +0100
Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 16:55 -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > Anyway, why can't a schematic editor produce clean and beautiful
> > output??
> > 
> 
> Because it may need 5 seconds for startup in that case ;-)
> 
> Seriously, can we expect an FOSS schematics editor produce as nice
> graphics as inkscape and as nice text as LaTeX at the same time,
> and being easy to use also.

What is there in Wojciech's schematic [1] that would require the
likes of Inkscape?  It has some very nicely designed and cleanly
rendered symbols with pleasing line thicknesses, etc., but there is
no need for gradient fills, XML parsing, blur effects, and so many
other features that are part of Inkscape.

[1] http://www.ire.pw.edu.pl/~wkazubski/Wzmacniacz-RC

Yes, TeX does produce beautiful text.  Yes, it is big.  But surely
we can produce nice-looking subscripts and superscripts without
TeX.  I'm not opposed to an optional feature that makes use of TeX,
however.

What is really required for “publication-quality” schematics
besides some slightly improve symbols (I think some of Kai-Martin's
symbols on gedasymbols.org are particularly elegant, for instance).

Regards,
Colin

- Raw text -