X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	ham03.websitewelcome.com
X-Spam-Flag2999:	NO
X-Spam-Level2999:
X-Spam-Status2999:	"No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gibibit.com;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BWhitelist:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir:X-Source-Sender:X-Source-Auth:X-Email-Count:X-Source-Cap;
	b=eXhgjVxXPSK6A/iuJ8//m51q2BtHMU3BhAuw6hO5fh8w7nIBa4bF/pCLbjwtvD0eRw9xqK6bZXsOmwNziDrb8S5fIlup9rX60mVbEVsQ7HCSDhX+wdpVXxdZh62N3zJa;
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:55:53 -0800
From:	Colin D Bennett <colin AT gibibit DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Text formatting
Message-ID:	<20120309165553.727c8400@svelte>
In-Reply-To:	<1331339779.2533.43.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
References:	<1331337138 DOT 10630 DOT 1 AT kwak>
	<1331339779 DOT 2533 DOT 43 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com
X-BWhitelist:	no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender:	c-24-16-114-89.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (svelte) [24.16.114.89]:53179
X-Source-Auth:	colin AT gibibit DOT com
X-Email-Count:	1
X-Source-Cap:	c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:36:19 +0100
Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:

> On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 00:52 +0100, Kai-Martin wrote:
> > 
> > > How can we add this, without breaking existing code?
> > 
> > My favorite: Add the ability to parse and render latex commands.
> 
> I am unsure again...
> 
> When looking at the fine PDF of Wojciech Kazubski I thought: Yes,
> we should have subscript. But after a more detailed look: Can a
> schematic editor really make complete beautiful graphics, or will
> always something be missing? For the later case, post-processing
> with tools like inkscape may be the better choice, and we should
> concentrate on good SVG output. 

I would not do manual post-processing like that.

What if you need to make a change to the schematic?  Then you need
to re-do your manual processing in Inkscape.

Anyway, why can't a schematic editor produce clean and beautiful
output??

Regards,
Colin

- Raw text -