delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=gamma; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=3UZe/vQYodoFnKBi/kNo3gycN17xDzWwgjDeRe/l4W0=; | |
b=lRJCvOS7kbz3POggMXI26Z2bNhIvx/vu/enNyuROjTD0tdq9Z8DOdPeQJjlMSn6IA4 | |
y5HN/N16VJ8UHcCEV/4h19iTjZhmrPrFWvOsAgTz+LvT6QdIaTx9p66QnA70Ol7FveW4 | |
T735/8MNjABdLWWns5hw/bSnNYJYDfAfu7BrY= | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20120118105942.GA10816@visitor2.iram.es> |
References: | <20120118090450 DOT GB28925 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> |
<20120118093353 DOT 10720 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
<CAJisMU2b9O5pq3KTTbAMYdy8ZnkQh6m0kC3rwU1AjfrR7uL-Kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20120118105942 DOT GA10816 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:41:47 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <CAJisMU0RF-6LPTZhCtuF_GFO-J=fkqtQUTFuV3z78N-M7iXbow@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] BUG: disappearing dots in gschem |
From: | =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Ko=C5=9Bciuszkiewicz?= <k DOT kosciuszkiewicz AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es> |
Cc: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q0INfoDR027203 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
W dniu 18 stycznia 2012 11:59 użytkownik Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es> napisał: > Correct. The dots only seem to appear in the middle of segments, but > not when you have a mix of pins and net segments. And, as far as I remember > there was never a dot when three pins coincide, which may happen fairly > frequently in passive circuits as shown in the new attachments; these do > not cover all the cases, since up to 4 pins/segments may coincide easily, > and more if you use non horizontal/vertical net segments or, shudder, pins. The fix for the issue is now in git HEAD. I have also fixed the case of junction dots on connections where only pins are involved without net segments. Best regards, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |