X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=DKISgDHTsRMfw4jbtb6NdC7oQXXBnrOzeFg5y01h7EE=;
	b=JmdGXVLqvheagwJI8sb/99TNBKWo14Kjbnyiy94UTIWyUj/U9x0XoeLB75xzVxDlA1
	qDIym9ES9w+1lngmbobR07gTHclRCKEFEshDX/mauw/fqcsdhlTQSJHXWF51Moz3GZmL
	eNdYk4WCtfLgFEs1ZaPvN29RwJ2fQIABHMh3Y=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<9E8604A1-E961-43F6-91C9-A5E4C1719248@noqsi.com>
References:	<CA+82U9J4GvssKrnRNOTTMuDc4zHy+PxeWb8OXeWP6NVHfoA0Nw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1486241a-88b7-4c8d-8354-ded392eadf96 AT email DOT android DOT com>
	<CAA0yOM6e_raSs_3tBv_+1OTNj+cZdN91cJU3hKkeW90E23z4nA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CA+82U9+CzLMdBvyyJxsYWR==BXWjWGrU+zWNXL+-g9tsh7uLbw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA0yOM5ej1dMOOtcbYYRdc=7yW6hZj=cmpuypYt9c_X_k5NM7A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CA+82U9+2pQBscOYsWBbLPtEpb1MyTEKe5dr8wzdJYJnFqCjWgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA0yOM5+uj6cHuxVsz18SPqd=ULC_-EbaUb0ffj14wkdj_dHiQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4EC9CE99 DOT 5040303 AT industromatic DOT com>
	<4ED27309 DOT 6030100 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20111127231842 DOT 3FD9B81F6262 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<4ED30BB2 DOT 8030301 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20111128075947 DOT F0D6681F6266 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<4ED36081 DOT 5080507 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAPYb0EEtYnpYkTNygCJCkYG7bk3jZu3WHx09C023RWXqDCHyrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20111202101147 DOT 04de74dd DOT attila AT kinali DOT ch>
	<CAOuGh89uoQWbWyDMHAH4G=mgEFhoe2+aPdvJ2H82d01cwCNErA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<9E8604A1-E961-43F6-91C9-A5E4C1719248 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:29:34 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAPYb0EEbg0iMNtjXQoVzp+3P_PcmP7t_M1hq0mksAn=E1ZT06g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: I won't do BGA's
From:	Bob Paddock <bob DOT paddock AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pB3FTcZx017781
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> 3. The chips work well with OpenOCD and GNU tools.

The AVR family had good GCC support in WinAVR until Atmel took it internal.

>I'm too busy to waste time with Windows.

Most everyone doing real work, except management and IT at companies
would agree with your Windows assessment.
Most of us don't use Windows by choice but by edict from on-high.
(Resume anyone?)

> 3. Example code is pure lasagna, thoroughly obfuscating the hardware/software relationships.

Atmel example code is frequently just plain wrong.

> 4. Documentation is a mashup. One would think that in the 21st century, processor manuals could include relevant details (like register addresses) where they are needed (as they did in the 1960's), but Atmel can't seem to manage real automated document generation.

Most of the documentation starts in Russian for AVR's, and in the past
French for the ARM's, I don't know who is doing it since Atmel France
closed.  The poor translation to English shows frequently.
In the past you could get data sheets well in advance for the AVRs at
http://www.atmel.ru , alas they now redirect you based on your region.
 I really hate sites that think they know better than give me what I
asked for.

- Raw text -