delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=gamma; | |
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date | |
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; | |
bh=SG2JgS3zin6jL9txbcl7pEn0P02kr1Qs3tRElanVg7M=; | |
b=vKMeajL8fTdEOxnL5j1gtdIeIPTsvRmV8lnTIaMAV/M9Uj+sMyi8vTicD4iygrLviK | |
LXBlRLdTqREBU2mGax30MjuJRPY/zENFDXBA1tkjWtIdcQObqTmtOE/EB2awG1SItk41 | |
6wuHSlCWNgYX+F1SbVWdM4QXyl3XruIzBMx3g= | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Sender: | silicon DOT on DOT inspiration AT gmail DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <20111020172714.GB20384@malakian.lan> |
References: | <CAKakQccTk7cNBhDt4SM=jq5hrEBzWC8er53JSSNsch5+-7pCWw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<201110201548 DOT p9KFma9K019672 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<20111020172714 DOT GB20384 AT malakian DOT lan> | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:20:13 +1100 |
X-Google-Sender-Auth: | mYuGQK2aXyEEUGpqciWHcO-2S0s |
Message-ID: | <CAKakQccb967HgSod6BeULhCSj7gE+L0oAVb=L82pGcOphJ7ohw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Working with a 0.1mm grid |
From: | Stephen Ecob <stephen DOT ecob AT sioi DOT com DOT au> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Andrew Poelstra <asp11 AT sfu DOT ca> wrote: > No, it's the "only use cmils for backward compatibility" code. Could the problem be solved by changing this code to only use cmils when the value can be exactly represented in cmils ? For example, a value of 1.27mm could be output as 5000 cmils but a value of 0.1mm would be output as 0.1mm (or 100um, etc)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |