X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Cam-AntiVirus:	no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails:	not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo:	http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Message-ID:	<1317547504.3433.4.camel@localhost>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Building PCB with Mac OS X 10.6.8
From:	Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:25:04 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<CAMonFrSSnMa060aQCiu4N4doMUmRogCdz7kkRxvuDn7Lp0mAww@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<9BA5588F-2354-41EC-9B67-740D896945DA AT comcast DOT net>
	<CAMonFrRVL2KmKGgt90a9EuDqwHKUCa+GAGU_=yQxMFoPEodfnQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Prayer DOT 1 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 1110012334370 DOT 9767 AT hermes-2 DOT csi DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<CAMonFrSSnMa060aQCiu4N4doMUmRogCdz7kkRxvuDn7Lp0mAww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.2.0-
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--=-Q7PYE/aQawF14N6GV8xB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 08:52 +0200, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 00:34, Peter C.J. Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
> > I would expect that the purpose of moving the predicate computation to
> > runtime (rather than at build time) lets us cross-compile for other tar=
get
> > architectures (e.g. Win32), without having to know what the results wil=
l be
> > on that architecture at build time.
>=20
> Will this change make it into gst repository? This would make thing
> easier from a packagin perspective.

Unfortunately, I doubt it. No-one is working on the topological
autorouter (which is why we use libgts), and it isn't obvious that the
libgts authors would even want that change.

I guess it could be raised with the upstream authors of libgts, but the
main barrier is effort / time required to do so.

> > But we shouldn't be conflicting with a system install libgts. (I guess =
we
> > probably _are_ conflicting from what you said), but we should get away =
with
> > just statically linking our local copy of that library.
>=20
> Conflicting at a file level, the install target tries to copy builtin
> libgts.* files that are already being provided by gts.

That is bad of us.. we should definitely try to fix that.

Best wishes,

--=20
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)

--=-Q7PYE/aQawF14N6GV8xB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJOiC3wAAoJEOo4D/b1x+QVGp4H/2K0wQYK0mzHIe0jCe58YCCv
w38FOG+KJf3Rb+PSgj3GoCSst1EAk/LwaesGIdWjihrruwi3fkhT5ZcpCx4qaslJ
9j09IIPDl9eAF0QyveH5jA5PX1nXO2+NIqfLiEaqDBfKl8GiE7cc5BZwW0NIDaUJ
OE9QnqubO8XCVPtucTqI9dv0kdX689LuZcuTcgWhY8gUkQkvC/w1PD1ubVb3+p0Z
XOhVHkLvO5jBuN8E/5kjC665WuXh5Nu2uyKzocsi4BzUTxQ35jXkoQP0ENFyCiHj
DsPXosgKOkmz1mD1oabC76HrudG0bGnRFfufrSVe3LjJrMuSduUhbZZKI3kcFCY=
=mzHo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Q7PYE/aQawF14N6GV8xB--

- Raw text -