X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=OW1V09qvtCzFwRe3hRHaGEwO/OOgKsnNHk6+2vyIW78=;
	b=RyzARx/TxFiYd0+Z1FtAuFLVFI8HGt97RNfxptdiZuoqP8pTRXpYT4o/ZDkpfXBCau
	62R97HImlOAsuHBsh1xxyDwiVnThw31H9Uh1fMA2+EpiZROxhGdNjmtOqZPfehcVKehT
	YUCxeJW7SD7ITqAHUPW0byK/Vmsc5rST3mdTZZ/9CNIuy9M01BPLLMFoq5sP2j6FZkj9
	1rHG+F+PGQK4ynoPyR7mHCPiJT5Zd2LWq/Gp1YQpElVlxCPbg4tkvZx1phNKjbZL4h0r
	euoRJQUCaaVmtqd5yD5zVgVWMzJ9T7EQjRwSD0S8N+oh0MYKg0YJG7dNOeh1FkFKECxj
	Sstw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.180.160.210 with SMTP id xm18mr8787168wib.93.1438107052266;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhTF3f442e8AoeGN0J391__annyVP0uC8B+RmfU448tFTw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAONhAosa8509VEWHQ_BUFp5iu9RA_65m8EzfZ-YMqDMJMpNZAw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTnp1Qxg5nOhWTGsbB1-rmdXg2fTKc3PWAGU9fp8sT8LQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAONhAotg6DOCj_Bd13gouNcX+Z25ZzpqXOyy4NENuBckGe1-QA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTF3f442e8AoeGN0J391__annyVP0uC8B+RmfU448tFTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 20:10:52 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAONhAotL758xNzBfjZP-5Z1aC3xyU2nY+vey-GXcAV=GXeKSGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Strategy of adding netname attributes in gSchem?
From:	"=?UTF-8?B?Q3PDoW55aSBQw6Fs?= (csanyipal AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6SIB0rj008432
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

2015-07-28 17:55 GMT+02:00 Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Csányi Pál (csanyipal AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> 2015-07-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
>> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>:
>>> I don't mean to stomp on your dreams but there is an ethical concern
>>> here. You are very likely to harm bats. 60KHz is the centre of here
>>> hearing frequency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_detector

From the abowe link I quoted this here:
"Bats emit calls from about 12 kHz to 160 kHz, but the upper
frequencies in this range are rapidly absorbed in air."

So one can say that that any ultrasonic mosquito repellent can to harm
bats, right?

-- 
Regards from Pál

- Raw text -