X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=PB9S6F7eFEyZWfc+y5cfAbVGi810VVmZMbWeLJN7GpQ=;
	b=uLJhh/zQoTuDuf7ldzNRFTCUJaqUYnJdsc3Ow6NB7mGEy45GCF1Eyb8GFpxdFkeGW3
	xFwIxI98fewh9wx3Q2RpJI9EiEDOfz8Yby+Wf/6sjAvQmeFbgJiaj7yNUgatRlbWwfDH
	T7hYqhZf2DOJNIfIJKahW7P3JOhwWvQvbQZjkC5tHU8aI5FrdEm1/ri23rtQvF28mYjN
	xloFeeaYOY3M52Spar7Toh3Pevo5ySAoisF7rc1zm/g9K2WOdsWfcpGITG0TunicIJfb
	h53YF701nFCMwfomqD/5G8QnpWPNwcVTPHnsOXB7729tQfbONI12C9ze7lfLpmeFjOFC
	8XxQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.161.197 with SMTP id xu5mr33511054lbb.69.1438098922364;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAONhAotg6DOCj_Bd13gouNcX+Z25ZzpqXOyy4NENuBckGe1-QA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAONhAosa8509VEWHQ_BUFp5iu9RA_65m8EzfZ-YMqDMJMpNZAw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTnp1Qxg5nOhWTGsbB1-rmdXg2fTKc3PWAGU9fp8sT8LQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAONhAotg6DOCj_Bd13gouNcX+Z25ZzpqXOyy4NENuBckGe1-QA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:55:22 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTF3f442e8AoeGN0J391__annyVP0uC8B+RmfU448tFTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Strategy of adding netname attributes in gSchem?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6SFtQPL024758
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Csányi Pál (csanyipal AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 2015-07-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>:
>> I don't mean to stomp on your dreams but there is an ethical concern
>> here. You are very likely to harm bats. 60KHz is the centre of here
>> hearing frequency.
>
> I agree with you.
>
> I think: a quiet music could be nice, but a loud music could be
> harmful to peaple.
> This may be similar to bats, don't you think?

That is not how it works plus your device basically makes a pure tone
not music. I work for people who study hearing loss.

> I read somewhere that that some mosquitos are able to produces sound
> frequencies of 60 kHz, when they mate.

Yes and that is part of why bats use that frequency.

> This could be music for bat's ears if it is quiet, don't you think?

More likely it will add to their already noise polluted environment.

> --
> Regards from Pál
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -