delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20210225212042.16269.qmail@stuge.se> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:20:42 +0000 |
From: | "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board |
References: | <xnh7nchcyj DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
<4b1d3d85-7f93-9eac-c4eb-9f84f2a47e61 AT bitflipper DOT ca> | |
<CAMw9acBn7xNo5jvrvS6Dof6JtYgOOLVKJwFFTu93S+CoPszjHw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAMw9acBn7xNo5jvrvS6Dof6JtYgOOLVKJwFFTu93S+CoPszjHw@mail.gmail.com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 11PLKiPA032211 |
Reply-To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Torben Friis (friistf AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Now I am confused - should I use gEDA or Lepton/Lepton-cli? I think the fundamental difference is that gEDA/gaf moved/moves away from using scheme scripting to Python, while lepton continues to center around scheme. Both projects have relevant development, the basics should work fine in both, so personally I'd only consider lepton if I were a scheme fanboy (which I'm definitely not :) and choose gEDA/gaf otherwise. //Peter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |