X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 29 May 2017 05:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-help AT delorie DOT com from="gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Thank you verry much, next Idea - IPC proof
In-Reply-To:	<20170529022113.GB12397@stuge.se>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1705290458510.27212@igor2priv>
References:	<20170515111111 DOT 1ba62f47 AT debian> <CAJZxidAk2Ur3B1Hox5_iWJGXiLyYZZXikJnnjxUt_kXUL==CQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170516163211 DOT 2d920db6 AT debian> <CAJZxidDBoc+HdL9VvCSfuytMTO+g=kLiicJ6HrJSeuo-BCQDgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170529010708 DOT 29be8939 AT debian>
	<20170529022113 DOT GB12397 AT stuge DOT se>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 29 May 2017, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> We can add some SMD-Footprints to the standard library  in accordance
>> to the IPC.
> ..
>> And more Easy is the including of some standard footprints "IPC0603",
>> "IPC0805","IPC2220"....
>>
>> What you think about.
>
> Footprints are an interesting topic. The thing is, many people want
> to make small variations on standardized footprints, myself included.
>
> There are different reasons to do so, one is to simplify hand
> assembly, another is to adjust for board fab parameters.

That's just a set of optional parameters in the parametric footprint 
model; the stock parametrics for pcb-rnd supports that for most 
footprints. For example in a so() footprint the main parameters 
are the number of pins and row spacing, but a lot of detailed parameters 
are optionally accessible, like pad_thickness=xx, pad_clearance=xx.

> I think a new data model for (among other things) footprints which
> includes such parameters would be useful, and I would love to spend
> a month or two working on that, but I'm not able to do so at the
> moment. :\

Slightly related: we did a feature request poll among active pcb-rnd users 
a few months ago. The most popular features, the winners were: ediatable 
mask/paste layers and new footprint model. (We are going to release the 
implementation for the former in a few days.) I've already allocated a 
month of pure coding for the new footprint model. Will announce details 
soon, on geda-user@.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -