X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 29 May 2017 02:21:13 +0000
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Thank you verry much, next Idea - IPC proof
Message-ID:	<20170529022113.GB12397@stuge.se>
References:	<20170515111111 DOT 1ba62f47 AT debian>
	<CAJZxidAk2Ur3B1Hox5_iWJGXiLyYZZXikJnnjxUt_kXUL==CQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20170516163211 DOT 2d920db6 AT debian>
	<CAJZxidDBoc+HdL9VvCSfuytMTO+g=kLiicJ6HrJSeuo-BCQDgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20170529010708 DOT 29be8939 AT debian>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20170529010708.29be8939@debian>
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> We can add some SMD-Footprints to the standard library  in accordance
> to the IPC.
..
> And more Easy is the including of some standard footprints "IPC0603",
> "IPC0805","IPC2220"....
> 
> What you think about.

Footprints are an interesting topic. The thing is, many people want
to make small variations on standardized footprints, myself included.

There are different reasons to do so, one is to simplify hand
assembly, another is to adjust for board fab parameters.

I think a new data model for (among other things) footprints which
includes such parameters would be useful, and I would love to spend
a month or two working on that, but I'm not able to do so at the
moment. :\


//Peter

- Raw text -