X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:45:54 +0100
From:	"Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] pinseq
Message-ID:	<20170203094554.138ffb18@debian.olsr>
In-Reply-To:	<CAMvDHVCnmWxzrnnD3GFbfa6sgQmJXiY8f7PiV21adxEXCjrPgQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20170201190901 DOT 7796c45d AT debian>
	<2A68D8FB-6CAA-40E5-8265-571627133EE4 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<ZAblcTuoh3wDaZAbmcm7ML AT videotron DOT ca>
	<58936E2E DOT 1090905 AT videotron DOT ca>
	<057B1612-5761-4C54-A2A5-2FF26E89832C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20170202201255 DOT GB16844 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<C0E0F6DF-2E0A-4811-9D70-B99C0C6CA989 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAMvDHVCnmWxzrnnD3GFbfa6sgQmJXiY8f7PiV21adxEXCjrPgQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Organization:	Individuum auf blauem Planet
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v138jxOl006296
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Thank you all Guys.

Am Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:46:34 +0300
schrieb "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>:

> On 2/2/17, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 2, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
> > [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >  
> >> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:13:11AM -0700, John Doty wrote:  
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Ian Chapman (ichapman AT videotron DOT ca)
> >>> [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>> I always wondered what pinseq was all about so for PCB layout
> >>>> only use I can forget it?  
> >>>
> >>> You still need it for slotted components.  
> >>
> >> No, it is unnecessary, at least for current released (un)stable
> >> geda-gaf and current mainline pcb (I cannot verify any older
> >> versions though).  
> >
> > So you’ve changed the way slotdef works? That’ll break a lot of
> > projects...  
> 
> No, I've not changed anything as concerning pinseq. Though you're
> right (thank you for this point) and I was most likely wrong,
> sorry. My mistake is that I quickly searched for pinseq in
> gnetlist sources, and pinseq is also used in internals of libgeda
> for slot processing. So yes, it is required for slotted parts.
> 
>   Vladimir
> 

- Raw text -