delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=yFtpfFNWmnMqA86dX2V63M48x8qFCOj6PkpgEoUjrZk=; | |
b=yOAHl6vcdyZX64yJ6Z9zhhz8fsmWr1p2d4nalHSlz7A2ctXxF7z1+n3v7Kmx3aQRgE | |
7drwBtbyihfLtQUb4UMsCa3I9ZG4aBGzvw0H9S9xHyx2YaH2xYgtdl5k+NsaXdTj93f5 | |
9GwR88apIkuAEpkhkB4GDyvYW3w26eKaukZfyDUCdfO66wFpn1rKJIZICKEyJWBrO7pb | |
YFjDasQrUntU4A26im+kc+qQmuUuBfmFNu+JwmSDnCTva4JGRDYEOryTYxg3yedwJzwt | |
JLTbNIIRBCBsg0o7J1Z4aE7ofBRI2EAdWwvRjEEPlYEK7LIrDZ/lX/UWOEz05BNvI7w7 | |
dcBA== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.107.138.131 with SMTP id c3mr20079751ioj.0.1416163496588; |
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:44:56 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <CA+CyYa1zaMNquy-seoR23r0Ztg_NOHhe7naXmVs6VwjZ=HtpCA@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CA+CyYa1zaMNquy-seoR23r0Ztg_NOHhe7naXmVs6VwjZ=HtpCA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:44:56 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <CAAhxy3DJjPS6cRA82gDua-TWghHnZreHoco-g7Zf7oONsQpAUg@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-help] Multiple supply voltages |
From: | vattan <vatan DOT uml AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id sAGIj1ws028951 |
Reply-To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
So far in my experience and reading (I am not a power user by a loooong shot) hidden net/pin connections should never be used. all connections should be visible, all the "implied gnd and vcc' connections are just asking for trouble, I never liked them when I tried nad failed to use gEDA 5 years ago, and when I picked it back up a afew months back I thought my googling brought me to a few pages that said the modern way of doing things is to NEVER use them. my 2 cents. To the rest of the devs, my offer still stands to clean up the gSchem parts library to modern stds if someone will define them with/for me clearly, if someone "in the know" will clean up some of the docs. On 11/16/14, Mike Bushroe <mbushroe AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > Sorry, forgot to post my current config with the last post. > > gschem 1.8.2 (g875406c) > gsch2pcb 1.6 > xgsch2pcb 0.1.3 > pcb version 20140316 Compiled on Aug 29 2014 at 07:56:58 > Ubuntu 14.10 (just up from 10.04 through 12.04) > Toshiba 5.7GiB Core 2 Duo 2.2GHzx2 64bit > > I got an impossible to get around error when using the latest gschem, > sch2pcb, and pcb that would load onto 10.04, and then it would delete the > .new.pcb file with the error before I could read it and try to figure out > what the error was and how to fix. Never did, so I was forced to finally do > the system upgrade. I still hate Unity. But at least now the hidden error > is gone, leaving only a few thousand obscure ones left! > > I am trying to make a single phase power to 3 phase power converter for a > friend to run a lathe, and throwing in partial speed control and reverse > for free. As a result, I am using two full wave diode blocks to generate > plus 120V DC and minus 120V DC for the MOSFET H-bridges to chop up back > into 220V AC. But that means the nmos switches have to sit on the lowest > voltage, the -120V supply rail, and the driver chip needs 15V above the > -120V, and the digital inputs to the drivers need 5V above the -120V rail. > That means a 7805 and a 7815 whose ground pins are not at chassis ground. > On the other hand the ATMega that I am using to control the whole mess does > not have the main digital power and ground pins explicitly on the symbol > and so aren't hardwired into the second 7805 that provides true 5V above > ground. > > I keep getting warning messages about nets being shorted together, which > I think means that hidden attributes in the 7805 and 7815 symbol are > shorting -120V to chassis ground. On the other hand the buried power and > ground connections on the Atmel seem to be making Vcc pin not found errors. > > I have tried copying the 7805 and 7815 symbols into my circuit directory > and making local copies of them and removing all references to 'gnd'. But > then I get found multiple instances errors, so I am guessing that it does > not do 'local instance over rides global instance' type symbol loading and > I add a dash number to the local name and re-edit the schematic to use the > new name. I tried many ways and many power symbols to get a Vcc net going > that the hidden pins on the ATMega would use, but that seemed to cause more > problems than it cured. > > My current guess is that I should go back to the original delivered > symbols and find some way to override the built in hidden pin net bindings > and either have ignore everything and just meekly go with where the wiring > connects it or find a way to uniquely name my unusual power rails (see post > above about trouble with names) and get them to connect to the 'ground of > my choice' instead of the chassis ground. But I don't recall seeing any > tutorials on how to over ride the hidden 'net:' pin attributes other than > that I should 'promote' the hidden attribute and change it to something. > Can anyone point me to a different tutorial that gives more specifics on > overriding power connections? (when 'ground' really means '-120V'?) > > Thanks again fro your help! > > Mike > -- > "Creativity is intelligence having fun." — Albert Einstein >
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |