X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to
	:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=yY6O7mju6yeU+wYDYwPu4Oq06NH2SjSc1XXeD499AbE=;
	b=aX6zi3NHbphYA1jpEdw58BA5RJ/5ZMX8EpZ2a3a2KBikkazERt3JHP+EHFc/CnHsQg
	DXbv9KpqDx2Kb836UW1a6GTgYUaoNRCr+Xdt6bavdPnNUfhZSPvNF3jjyhJJ9eIJVaAg
	QtcF2mb/oRF55J2bBxuU7UwUbmQsXWWhrvCPdqRp6FrcvoMPrnqlR/NaiYHu3a0mUpy6
	3j83kjEb1buCyBGHPmV2H5T3TPHqgzzh2H4eBG84VZiGfYnFN8T7sD+uBCzzXAGj60vo
	9zyG9VF9zAp2Cnb4U5hXgo7F3xKdOLGYL+GdzrLQWXCczcfarqngnd9ZicEii9+9eCMW
	IemQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQkm0iCsv4o229bIY3Hco5gxtsg496+tC8jhZ3HhYpdHR6eAr5zAqgUEDpbJwtHBjKEXaxlh
X-Received:	by 10.50.136.225 with SMTP id qd1mr18994898igb.39.1403482983076;
	Sun, 22 Jun 2014 17:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender:	Brian Davis <bd AT depo2020 DOT com>
Message-ID:	<53A5F5FC.4070802@jollyrogerlabs.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:15:40 -0400
From:	Brian Davis <bd AT jollyrogerlabs DOT com>
Organization:	Jolly Roger Labs
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Single side only pads
References:	<53A1964B DOT 802 AT jollyrogerlabs DOT com> <201406181836 DOT s5IIabnH001842 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201406181836.s5IIabnH001842@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com

Actually, I would prefer that the soldermask cover those areas, is there 
a way to allow it to cover the pads on the top level but not on the 
bottom level?  This is mostly for aesthetics.

-Brian

On 06/18/2014 02:36 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I have a board for which most components and traces are on the solder
>> side, but a few need to have pads on the component side, so I would like
>> the ability to have pads only on a single side.  I ran across a
>> discussion from 2005 which suggested the use of very small annular rings
>> plus a coincident SMD pad, is this still the preferred method?  Is there
>> a way to embed this approach in a footprint, or do I need to perform
>> these actions for each board?
> PCB uses "pads" to mean SMT component lands, is this what you mean?
> Or do you mean the copper annulus around a pin?
>
> The only way to have a pin with different annulus sizes on each side
> is to have the "pin" have the smaller size, and use an overlapping SMT
> pad for the larger size.  This can be done in the footprint.
>
> But... if you're using both sides of the board, is there really a
> reason to need to reduce the size of the annulus on the "unused" side?

- Raw text -