X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=ss5iUDve9YmYdf7FElb+9PABUHrx37x/sgsDm/Fwaxg=;
	b=WFLmqNvgY0w8eLyhXHAfDsiRQ8Qah9FsET8T+RxuNA7yeFwkOGbzkgLMuwhfRzQL81
	BjHWA4NZLjxJXP2KGBIrzduthn6sGc4JKEDuoQtGaTcF+lpiZ3vwIh9eNeXo6LOV22jM
	zme8t4BnpeaZav1EAvLKNauVi8Peo1PMNshsZFixft2MqW3T9Ec7y1fBVfk87Uj4NOoT
	qFmzF6ENQe+Vmmbb3xi1n3sA1r7kHKJAS5VKVZrro6f7ulpki7lLITFIvyElyMvn7u5Z
	gv+cG+4fpRQSWqrViaaZT3v1JVtx8qphWMaO9vF7v8ZCIDS268hPeClIc+C2e84NWmLx
	ZZpQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.79.138 with SMTP id j10mr5226064igx.47.1397841803088;
	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<1397839098.937.6.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
References:	<CAAhxy3Bm+KvP3m2zO9sn6MGswfwjemcuAFOTafuso7NZjGmOkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAAhxy3AXKsY5HDyYMAYU2QZ9g_8VmSgtQxQT8m9Vh+JfJJL5gg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAAhxy3D3LHmeyWdfuz0fS1vm9r8NA4fORirTjJ9TbTZgW87dkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1397836799 DOT 937 DOT 5 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<1397839098 DOT 937 DOT 6 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:23:22 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAAhxy3AU6qx_95tKBuFDc7k+wYPJHq5sYL0C3ub=3z1-GNTyig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Alphanumeric pins a lie?
From:	Cyrus Vatan <vatan DOT uml AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--089e0122ab7420a5ec04f75468b9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Oh ok, that makes sense, i guess I would have expected an error.  I
assumed  the pin seq attribute drove which pin would be mapped when they
were letters.  This actually may simplify a few annoying footprints,
although i am suprised there is no error when there is a mismatch between
sym and footprint pins.  Does this mean accidenntly putting a 5 pin
footprint on a 4 pin device will not throw any warnings or errors?
On Apr 18, 2014 12:40 PM, "Stefan Salewski" <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:

> On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 17:59 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > There should be some more
> > information in the documentation -- unfortunately transistors are the
> > more difficulty elements...
>
> In case you have not found it yourself:
>
> http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:transistor_guide
>
>
>

--089e0122ab7420a5ec04f75468b9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Oh ok, that makes sense, i guess I would have expected an error.=C2=A0 I=
 assumed=C2=A0 the pin seq attribute drove which pin would be mapped when t=
hey were letters.=C2=A0 This actually may simplify a few annoying footprint=
s, although i am suprised there is no error when there is a mismatch betwee=
n sym and footprint pins.=C2=A0 Does this mean accidenntly putting a 5 pin =
footprint on a 4 pin device will not throw any warnings or errors?</p>

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Apr 18, 2014 12:40 PM, &quot;Stefan Salewski&=
quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mail AT ssalewski DOT de">mail AT ssalewski DOT de</a>&gt; wr=
ote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 17:59 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:<br>
&gt; There should be some more<br>
&gt; information in the documentation -- unfortunately transistors are the<=
br>
&gt; more difficulty elements...<br>
<br>
In case you have not found it yourself:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:transistor_guide" target=3D"_b=
lank">http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:transistor_guide</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--089e0122ab7420a5ec04f75468b9--

- Raw text -