delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=3I6v/rb0LICNuLSf+tsmRoPYqVpEFuPnn3vU/FG2IVo=; | |
b=w5XVxTmdBWrfHZZvWpInsXd0a9TuPZ2G0viqJgjHI4FRGfp3Vfngp5NZt5Y7BiR73Y | |
zu/mC80l/8TifLvOsWXxbBI+M0up1byty6Um9MV3bxwT1n4l6dli1S7yLvrUXus1RmQo | |
9BdSJnchoD2+gzeq+Tc9561fvSZEjYOkG+7EngK78TO+4XYM6prumzG45r/tlKYP+/SG | |
lXvbJhibXUHLXAWl92tPT0DfNsGt4BsHISJg9UGgvNmVX7uIGEjgqNQt2KL2od3SpgRe | |
OHn7l7jWp8gB+P+CEuLHM/sO/rKEvMrvQ4yuJlBASTrZa2NiF5uUHMKgYltq/uPg9w/E | |
V2tw== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.50.44.115 with SMTP id d19mr4538340igm.1.1397834362537; Fri, |
18 Apr 2014 08:19:22 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <CAAhxy3AXKsY5HDyYMAYU2QZ9g_8VmSgtQxQT8m9Vh+JfJJL5gg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAAhxy3Bm+KvP3m2zO9sn6MGswfwjemcuAFOTafuso7NZjGmOkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAAhxy3AXKsY5HDyYMAYU2QZ9g_8VmSgtQxQT8m9Vh+JfJJL5gg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
Date: | Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:19:22 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CAAhxy3D3LHmeyWdfuz0fS1vm9r8NA4fORirTjJ9TbTZgW87dkA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | [geda-help] Alphanumeric pins a lie? |
From: | Cyrus Vatan <vatan DOT uml AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Returning new user to gEDA, and first time user of mailing list so i hope ime doing this right. Anyways my issue is with pins with letters for pin numbers failing to have rats attached to them once imported into PCB. Is this a bug or am i using it wrong? Example would be a transistor with a pin w/ Pinnumber C Pinseq 1 Pinlabel C Pintype pas when i put it into a schematic it seems fine, and gsch2pcb does not complain of any unconnected pins which i thought it used to do, but that seems to be my imagination. However there will be no rats connected to that pin when oened in pcb, athough everthing else seems fine. The documentation clearly says pin num can be alpha numeric... any guidance appreciated. --e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p>Returning new user to gEDA, and first time user of mailing list so i hop= e ime doing this right.=C2=A0 Anyways my issue is with pins with letters fo= r pin numbers failing to have rats attached to them once imported into PCB.= =C2=A0 Is this a bug or am i using it wrong?=C2=A0 Example would be a trans= istor with a pin w/ <br> Pinnumber C<br> Pinseq 1<br> Pinlabel C<br> Pintype pas</p> <p>when i put it into a schematic it seems fine, and gsch2pcb does not comp= lain of any unconnected pins which i thought it used to do, but that seems = to be my imagination.=C2=A0 However there will be no rats connected to that= pin when oened in pcb, athough everthing else seems fine.=C2=A0 The docume= ntation clearly says pin num can be alpha numeric... any guidance appreciat= ed.</p> --e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |