Mail Archives: geda-help/2014/04/07/10:00:33
Hi Tibor,
On 14-04-06 12:38 AM, gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> Judging from this one, it seems like the problem is specific to U1 -
> the connection between the resistors worked well. However, I can't
> check again because you have changed a few things since (resistor
> footprints, the symbol behind LME, as you mentioned).
Well, the uploaded LME symbol was after changing the pintype=nc to
pintype=pas,
so the only change, really, was the footprint for the resistors. And the
outcome
when using my own R-SMT-0805.fp was exactly the same (of course, with
the SMT
footprints showing instead of the through-hole ones for R025).
>
> 1. hover the mouse over the middle of U1, between pins, and press 'd';
> this would annotate each pin with its pin number. Even better please
> do this for the resistors as well. Please make a screenshot with these
> annotations.
Did that. It shows 1 through 15 at the correct positions. Same for the
resistors
(shows 1 and 2 for the two SMT pads)
> 2. upload the pcb tight after gsch2pcb, then open from pcb, load
> netlist, disperse, optimize rats, make sure the same resistor-only-net
> has the rats then save the pcb and upload that as well.
I'm not sure what you're referring to in here --- what is "pcb tight"??
Also, notice that I've been using the GUI version of gsch2pcb (I go to
Nautilus File browser, then right-click on nada-LME49811.sch and
select "Open with gEDA Schematic -> PCB Project", like they show
in the youtube video --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Faf2nACG34,
around minute 3:30 of the video).
Do notice that I did not create any .prj file (on the Blinker board
section
in the tutorial in http://www.delorie.com/pcb/docs/gs/gs.html, they do it
that way, but I could never figure out all the details, so I went with the
workflow they show in the youtube videos).
>
> 3. please upload the .net file gsch2pcb spits out
>
> 4. please post the error log for this session (again there's been a
> lot changed, footpritns, symbols...)
>
> The netlist is embedded in the .pcb, so if PCB does something bad to
> the netlist internally, comparing the files produced in step 2. and 3.
> would help. If PCB has problems with the pin numbering, the screenshot
> of 1. woudl show. Currently these are the things I think could go
> wrong there.
I'll keep this in mind. I was quite busy over the weekend and will be
today
and tomorrow, but as soon as I have some time available, I will do these
and upload files and screenshots or screen video (this recordmydesktop
package works really well!!!! :-) )
Thanks!
Carlos
--
- Raw text -