X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=vS2QeZ0y4d5l09heJ6xll47CFE/JhKozLwuERg7PZy8=;
	b=lmn/tocFKFyVqiEeyVU+PEzWxiSdID/vQ8x721d5v5Jb/9BiVhGEujCQ4d3IPoS9vT
	y8cwhbfB+qOg7m8Jha/6S/hlFv6f2/YU+tMT0szdMzsaazwXy7o2o24j9sOUUeDawNYQ
	ncOygkzgNL7EUjvmKODeYzcNYiypJie2MT+Fuw40XsesF8pTraLG7mzaOsiY5GfcVr35
	PNKmKI7+CWshZWnwbdLzC2RqnRsKMoDdRf8LAQ2+uzk9KcJ3deJMzo26OuvwpBitZFfP
	xVK33ItXaBuM4u0R6gOFpv+3DOrzmYfd1Bu9GzMuWTBqMuHOsJD6hCvceEI5Q1cGvW4U
	/ZHg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Originating-IP:	[62.221.5.234]
In-Reply-To:	<1355376162.1739.47.camel@hoho6.chidig.com>
References:	<1355360621 DOT 1739 DOT 45 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	<1355205873 DOT 14812 DOT 39 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	<1763693 DOT MV8q8EB28b AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	<1355342881 DOT 1739 DOT 13 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	<3323134 DOT U0L5kasnFv AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	<20121213012835 DOT 29523 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<1355376162 DOT 1739 DOT 47 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:49:42 +0000
Message-ID:	<CANqhZFxNUdeXr-Fsed6VJ2dwkzOQxzJh87GtY+uJRsWJi=x2qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Dirt Dumb Level..
From:	Gareth Edwards <gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQmelSrLOZ+fqAU+W58Lnzi0FFz6wBKf5dmEdF6Uolxrhd9M2WO8HQkuaKijUq+agENO4sVD
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 13 December 2012 05:22, Bob Gustafson <bobgus AT rcn DOT com> wrote:
> I think it was Peter TB Brett who wrote that >> >

He did, and he wrote it to you. The implication of the statement was
that if you are /not/ running gaf 1.9.0 of newer, you will not have
the gaf command. Peter Stuge was trying to get you to confirm the
version of the software you are running.

Cheers
Gareth

- Raw text -