delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Date: | Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:05:23 +0000 |
From: | Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> |
To: | <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-help] Footprints |
Organization: | Surrey Space Centre |
In-Reply-To: | <CAF0dY_v1d-O2kazuNBt02y7SaMSCB+2tu7FxsGYCVC2Tz9ZkSg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAF0dY_vaL=4949F9h1eVE7kxiWA2=+mtOSCygsLvpk+Ds3g1+Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACNnPRkzfe0ErA7nwn3_kBJVkiLfbnf5g-byt14Q1WkJ899dyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAF0dY_uets66CFRYYhnufy-R_WwqxYCaaycNCvScAZd1ycYznA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201201031452 DOT q03EqBXC028986 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAF0dY_u_oZxVN57x-oAZONT0N=RK-oJCM3orzcxjuaEHxQ_2Ug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201201031548 DOT q03FmaQj031068 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAF0dY_v1d-O2kazuNBt02y7SaMSCB+2tu7FxsGYCVC2Tz9ZkSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <5d3ae0bd796e4bbd83cbd1bc61c44fac@mail.theimps.com> |
X-Sender: | peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk |
User-Agent: | RoundCube Webmail/0.2.2 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q03GFEUe013054 |
Reply-To: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-help AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:34:35 +0530, chetan patil <chtpatil AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > Regarding PCB. Is it that it is recommended only for smaller circuits. As I > think complexity will be an issue as components increase. That won't be the > case with gschem. I know of several very dense, high-pin-count multilayer boards that have been successfully designed with gschem an PCB. Peter -- Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |