X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net;
	s=badeba3b8450; t=1607647417;
	bh=wPshgJiEWSbVPBiFUKK9FwWnKo8lD7ocbTDqk2yFRio=;
	h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=BEKnv3G02quo4/lMqbaWpaFRD4LGyg8rY8vl2XTl3JbxTLQbNrIIbMUTI4Lm/beYU
	dYQpXaWKKC4SD9n6S1qpGJ+BII34c9d9eY0a2XMIHLBn9q+hsr71XS/Djk6fiLIBiN
	pGSujUjO4zlYYv7y336ox/RWkPsGYhhorZvKp7wA=
X-UI-Sender-Class:	01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Message-ID:	<5FD2C0B9.8080208@gmx.de>
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:43:37 +0100
From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Difficulties compiling libc from repository using gcc 10.N.0
References:	<5FD1FEA1 DOT 7010304 AT gmx DOT de> <CAA2C=vB2FUmrC_iboB7Mp3Uu2hLoTxWB2ptEOkjc69Az3FZU1A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAA2C=vB2FUmrC_iboB7Mp3Uu2hLoTxWB2ptEOkjc69Az3FZU1A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:83BxScyK0GqhXukN31N5Km9Fw7ExIDUzCezcvx9BdpSNfRhubXg
	G4BHujggZDGf410DHRatnav17bi/WTvaftftnP+rJb6/l2gDiKsph8Z1fkqJyyuUf+aisB6
	PWzFctFFjhRjZ0vuwswFN/iCxZtUMa/sCg6n085yt9uBfUX2z6prGnXipzR4RjiA/l2/04B
	oeya6Gbo9NjcoJd0tcwUA==
X-Spam-Flag:	NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:3hP2r1ahYqY=:fx2Lr/oyF8qwOrlOi7fWjA
	v2nm7Cz3LWWVzHCJNCOW0vTWcObZqqWdQyMzxr0qUlIQA6KorFZgYhVbh0hoO7iCzbNe4I+dt
	2IaApkFaI4d6VDLpxt+C6mMEP1JCw0y5+7BDbtPdkCbLYkhXcGdTJgr3AQQGnHryS1Eehu2BB
	IPKm2UOTljBmrkhJKyU/LJHFh444Bw2bEETamOkklIuSAEEtEi5cFY2YVEzfRNQUTde3rBYA4
	h+z14+ygVMb9MN0+CFpDXHGL2/NqeYlM55t72my4LEfzBT37CE1Mt+VOyBgEfgYiZqbVF+6JD
	ns/t7I22m48WUG8jsfiIiUXQKTAyt2ne7lEhlSSeFGVyqLTpFhnnOr/3PsFLBaSsWjW6RN66u
	sSavIfen/CPDei0hDAo9iCmReKf6x/+kraGM3fqZ4QVFvNLESYrRk1XdJtqNdLlhoDrq1sQKt
	qwpR7qf3nPZbfrfZJrnLKsa4yO/Ta5GFLgKbcDFcVbf9EdLbQGpO6zJ/nDq1VY0Bsoy/pxTqJ
	Z+8m3VgwUlqwF3e86mD4KutnfVkg0lXuYD/YIi4W5qeg1fF4XpKz6rZ0kYFHoCwSsMYlSWz1D
	1IVrgPNj9QtAhpbD3Gk0hje7jKW3BFrHSHGtvzSzr0KqmhbHHEMr7iu3vxcP1wEbJT2nco+XG
	1PF7etyLkq55Z7YrnFzmMVNKzzpn1ihpc29qq7ncB8uK3Z39bUjLp9GeL/hnzIfW987MSQCN+
	p2Fm80YaM0gHB/GHH1x92CcZDxM9f2uC5sGBwwxw+DpIi3P7i3VXDAIy9+OB8egeIqxneKmAj
	IjqJzdZX8w1GnV/jIibjmWXpiZlGG0VYzxpjn1MTdYk94PhxktkCNWNxfvK6zY0bdqcOL/VVP
	ZqD7yOGL3B4GpP8U8Uhw==
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Am 10.12.2020 22:39, schrieb Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
> On 12/10/20, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via
> djgpp AT delorie DOT com]<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>  wrote:
>> d:/djgpp/include/io.h: In function '_chmod':
>> _chmod.c:28:14: warning: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of
>> 'int[1]' [-Warray-bounds]
>>      28 |     r.x.cx = *(&func + 1);  /* Value to set */
>>         |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> _chmod.c:14:34: note: while referencing 'func'
>>      14 | _chmod(const char *filename, int func, ...)
>>         |                              ~~~~^~~~
>>
>> The -Warray-bounds appears quite a lot due to our way to address
>> neighborhood variables as can
>> be seen in the example above.  May be some with some spare time can fix
>> these occurencies.
>
> As far as I can see, this particular case is intending this
> using a nasty shortcut?
What is today a nasty shortcut was a cool one 30 years ago.

>
> --- _chmod.c~
> +++ _chmod.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
>   #include<dpmi.h>
>   #include<fcntl.h>
>   #include<libc/dosio.h>
> -
> +#include<stdarg.h>
> +
>   int
>   _chmod(const char *filename, int func, ...)
>   {
> @@ -25,7 +26,12 @@ _chmod(const char *filename, int func, .
>       r.x.ax = 0x4300 + func;
>     _put_path(filename);
>     if (func == 1)
> -    r.x.cx = *(&func + 1);		/* Value to set */
> +  {
> +    va_list ap;
> +    va_start (ap, func);
> +    r.x.cx = va_arg(ap, int);		/* Value to set */
> +    va_end (ap);
> +  }
>     r.x.dx = __tb_offset;
>     r.x.ds = __tb_segment;
>     __dpmi_int(0x21,&r);
>
> Correct?  Any others like this?
Looks ok to me.  Will do the job; alternatively we would have to disable that check.

Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -