X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1566142302;
	bh=MsTDpdx6c4ub8Ma461NLNOw7iNpd0nIphPcmYMBHVYE=;
	h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID;
	b=bjRlvVVHWzn56nBZxqdTfOXgGhKxzT45omDx3bI72WhotCp8cZ7oXu9rOfnimRNAK
	eBLLrruSK5U9CadzuULvy56CjKkWY2MO1qAoEWwMHemaaKAuCcPJekZWqBsYl0kMIW
	WpkNZ0cC9gcoriNRORCi7lVnxdE+7stxSHgPf2z4=
Authentication-Results:	mxback20g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] exec: fix inversions in leak detection logic
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References:	<964e3268-2f75-ee73-ab5a-b01bf1aadb98 AT yandex DOT ru>
	<qj9iq5$1iqb$2 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
	<7551dfde-01be-7633-3d12-aab8533b66c7 AT yandex DOT ru>
	<qja8q7$h45$2 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> <83pnl2muf0 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<e21f937c-16c0-bf2c-9fe0-c30610c14123 AT yandex DOT ru> <83lfvqmt4i DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
From:	"stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<b3764d5b-4378-12db-95d6-f7cf39837c2e@yandex.ru>
Date:	Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:31:41 +0300
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<83lfvqmt4i.fsf@gnu.org>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x7IFWKua016476
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

18.08.2019 17:43, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] 
пишет:
>> From: "stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:29:52 +0300
>>
>> 18.08.2019 17:15, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
>> пишет:
>>>> From: Rod Pemberton <invalid AT lkntrgzxc DOT com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:17:31 -0400
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, this issue probably best reviewed by Eli or Charles.
>>> Charles, I hope (CC'ed).  I admit that I forgot these details years
>>> ago.
>> That patch was absoleted, I sent a new one.
> I'm sure Charles will read the entire discussion (if he is available).

He is not, I've got a mail delivery failures.
In either case, the new patch is much less
controversial:
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2019/08/17/21:43:14
While I am sure the code in question should
be simplified and be made conditional only
on known-buggy DPMI servers, I instead just
added the controling flag. Should be quite
simple to review by everyone.

- Raw text -