delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20161025; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; | |
bh=GqusahHReX1cxk/4YWBtRW8vnWfNpOW+FGBHR8mI/VE=; | |
b=RY47/aKCFRvvEqgizd+FVoJDvXtCCwEeGWdmfK+I1BMgBSvwGq5v0YHrcMZWP2ZoH4 | |
Ge08NYMBvdcwHeBAiJ/DInYpPF+ofRbcZMMPAg/7WyKDLfM23pwevBPSIaLca6Q+nBIU | |
UcdqAQGprW7dgpI4RUVBv6rahWthzYNPFGagBT0jD17EbyBDIS9xuyoXcXSkXpRfSOjd | |
hbR4KPfYGJsl5v3ROu/oX+xBQvZu0YaW2DUuWo8+aRBnEt+sXqZixKGDAHKhJsaXXTHR | |
oTiabguxmhnkmfTPcT3duPeN/+SH5NCkfp9bZfqwTwuyQ0lR86cBPdu2r2uHdOUzb1FK | |
yULg== | |
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=1e100.net; s=20161025; | |
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date | |
:message-id:subject:to; | |
bh=GqusahHReX1cxk/4YWBtRW8vnWfNpOW+FGBHR8mI/VE=; | |
b=t2YfngHTupclKgVvPT3sOYhAReVfIREPXOVAt1fDXUIuWBtJ42rSEln1cTOessvWcw | |
uoxZG7w7YN4nB/M3qCi0luQPO5LV7GH2ZkqAFH+8n9puGIg2r7n1d2Mvp+PqDQ2m5hgs | |
LWj9WwM5EMk7dB5EvY7BZbvkgy3V9ABWvvH/Tc0xNrpePF9M/rfuprI4lsgxxuGRjhRv | |
0MoSGqcEOGc0RSBIWoFhcpxstbtsxJGOtt1T+GYfBIQL2hz0Wq10cklSHL/zSLJY4Z6u | |
JnElvR+3uOkFI2jQCL2WewVolo7UltZd/fSiVaxEayi3F0QwaNzc+6Zgb4F1PXuOFn/Z | |
ACBg== | |
X-Gm-Message-State: | AKGB3mJo1L5jQy0PkreiqylcZHGkrVC/SFR1B3szfo4i3iWKhCVnbNWr |
1V/klPt9cHMcY3ohINxTSVnUgLLVRvjU/XzjpAo= | |
X-Google-Smtp-Source: | ACJfBovOyE6n7UkgIMSNofLaT2EE7wjotfe6cPdu8uoOWaCqR5aZeXdTrtnHR3uiWl1DOsQ8r8GEzA52SCyYSpBpx0s= |
X-Received: | by 10.55.127.68 with SMTP id a65mr361443qkd.77.1515175392371; Fri, |
05 Jan 2018 10:03:12 -0800 (PST) | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <5A4FB869.7070504@gmx.de> |
References: | <201707301540 DOT v6UFecLb017840 AT delorie DOT com> <CAA2C=vBWY7HYeu+tdO=WYN=wEmWfhLXWgH-9PtSvZkMs54rs1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<5980C3AA DOT 2080305 AT gmx DOT de> <euccrcFp8kqU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de> <598108FD DOT 5060908 AT gmx DOT de> | |
<83ini6zmsv DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5984FE96 DOT 9040905 AT gmx DOT de> <59D94AEB DOT 8050700 AT gmx DOT de> <5A4FB869 DOT 7070504 AT gmx DOT de> | |
From: | "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Jan 2018 21:03:11 +0300 |
Message-ID: | <CAA2C=vDU1F8im5ZnYgj_T+v1QPXwD3y_3FiaPirkK-63bYYM5A@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.29 uploaded. |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 1/5/18, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > Am 07.10.2017 23:45, schrieb Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) > [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]: >> Am 05.08.2017 01:09, schrieb Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) >> [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]: >>> Am 02.08.2017 05:11, schrieb Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via >>> djgpp AT delorie DOT com]: >>>>> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 01:04:29 +0200 >>>>> From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via >>>>> djgpp AT delorie DOT com]"<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> >>>>> >>>>> IMHO it is easier to fix stdio.h than start endless discussion with the >>>>> binutils >>>>> maintainers. I do not think that the DJGPP user group is still so large >>>>> that >>>>> some one will be hurd if we change _doprnt by __doprnt or something >>>>> similar. >>>> >>>> Renaming our _doprnt is certainly doable, but it means some >>>> application that really needs our _doprnt will now become broken. >>>> >>>> An alternative would be to move _doprint to some other header, like >>>> libc/doprnt.h. >>> >>> >>> I have moved the _doprnt, _doscan and _doscan_low declarations to >>> libc/doprnt. >>> The file name is arbitrary. If some one has a more appropriate one, >>> please >>> let me know. I have intentionaly moved also _doscan and _doscan_low >>> together >>> with _doprnt. I have seen no reasons to move one of them and let the >>> other >>> ones. This shall avoid possible future issues. >>> It is ok with me if someone likes to send a DJGPP specific fix to the >>> binutils >>> maintainers. I have checked that binutils can be compiled without >>> changes >>> with a libc modified by this patch. >>> If no one complains about these changes in a period of 3 or 4 weeks I >>> will >>> assume that the changes have been accepted and will commit them. >> >> >> I had encouraged every DJGPP user to send a patch to fix the _doprnt >> conflict in bfd.c. An inspection of binutils-2.29.1 shows that the >> issue has not been fixed and thus I have to assume that either no one >> has send a fix to the binutils maintainers or they have refused to fix >> this DJGPP specific issue. Thus I will commit the patch below today >> to fix this issue at libc level. As discussed before, the problematic >> declarations will be moved into a new header. > > OFYI, I have commited the proposed changes. > > Regards, > Juan M. Guerrero > Binutils already fixed that _doprnt issue mainstream: http://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=8f314ad58ec824ce6c8467af29f11583f79a80ea I don't see why we would still need those changes in djgpp: I suggest reverting them.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |