delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org |
X-Spam-Level: | |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 | |
Date: | Sun, 15 Jan 2017 17:26:41 +0200 |
Message-Id: | <83r3449wem.fsf@gnu.org> |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <83shol9elv.fsf@gnu.org> (djgpp@delorie.com) |
Subject: | Re: memory.h |
References: | <CAA2C=vAxwXB1-nsiDMmKQLt7rmkFHonK-8Cxqx4M_2uKN7ZzPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<83h951c41o DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
<CAA2C=vAQsONZ-bG1dnoso3RWno6bDWGeDhnMJk33RypA5JjG=A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<83d1fpc24q DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
<CAA2C=vA8sYus1m75UbeBvgJw_QQ-rs=RDc3hmpfSV_+1kYd3ug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <edvomqFgkgcU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de> <83shol9elv DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
X-detected-operating-system: | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] |
X-Received-From: | 2001:4830:134:3::e |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 05:38:52 +0200 > From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> > > > From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker AT t-online DOT de> > > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:57:28 +0100 > > > > >> Would it be okay to > > >> simply add string.h, without removing stdlib.h? > > > > It would be okay for the user code to do that. > > > > But strictly speaking, system headers are effectively forbidden from > > doing that by the language standard. > > Not really. The language of the standard doesn't say that, it only > says that the implementation shall _behave_ as if no such inclusion > happened. And since AFAIK this header is not in the Standard, I guess even the above isn't a binding requirement.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |