X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Date:	Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:27:49 +0200
Message-Id:	<83d1fpc24q.fsf@gnu.org>
From:	"Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:
	<CAA2C=vAQsONZ-bG1dnoso3RWno6bDWGeDhnMJk33RypA5JjG=A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	(djgpp AT delorie DOT com)
Subject:	Re: memory.h
References:	<CAA2C=vAxwXB1-nsiDMmKQLt7rmkFHonK-8Cxqx4M_2uKN7ZzPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83h951c41o DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vAQsONZ-bG1dnoso3RWno6bDWGeDhnMJk33RypA5JjG=A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-detected-operating-system:	by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From:	2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:16:05 +0300
> Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
> 
> IMO, there is no excuse in including stdlib.h instead of string.h from
> memory.h.  Possibly it was a typo?

Doesn't look like a typo to me: in DJGPP v1, memory.h included
djgppstd.h, which was a hodge-podge of functions, including many in
stdlib.h.

What problems does including stdlib.h cause?  Would it be okay to
simply add string.h, without removing stdlib.h?  That way, we don't
create possible backward incompatibilities that could break existing
programs.

- Raw text -