delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2016/08/01/12:00:10

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.31.125.193 with SMTP id y184mr48478036vkc.6.1470066148222;
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 08:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.29.72 with SMTP id m66mr3322758otm.20.1470066148180;
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 08:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160730190039.55fb9531@_>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2602:306:8371:4220:916f:898a:4243:b2a;
posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:8371:4220:916f:898a:4243:b2a
References: <761aff8d-eb27-fcae-5486-28fdf878d2fd AT iki DOT fi> <dc5085ec-7a16-4a97-bd28-0eded3afcd63 AT googlegroups DOT com>
<20160730190039 DOT 55fb9531 AT _>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e2ffe945-b061-4301-9744-4a2805e47686@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: About different programming language support for DJGPP port of GCC
From: "rugxulo AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0000
Bytes: 2119
Lines: 18
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 6:00:08 PM UTC-5, Rod Pemberton wrote:
>
> Of course, if almost no one is using DJGPP anymore or DOS anymore,
> then what's the point?

I don't think it's fruitful for me to try (yet again) to prove
that DOS is still alive and kicking. I doubt AdaCore (or FSF/GNU
or almost anybody) cares. They're blissfully ignorant. But ....

For instance, Free Pascal now officially has an i8086-msdos target
(as of 3.0.0 a few months ago). Even ReactOS now has a (partially
working, but not for DJGPP) NTVDM. FreeDOS 1.2 is still in the works
and will be released soon-ish (but no major infrastructural changes).

Is it enough? Will it ever be enough? When will somebody care? Can
anything awaken worldwide developer apathy? Doubt it. So, like always,
we just have to make do with what we already have.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019