X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:52:27 -0400
Message-Id:	<201607220152.u6M1qRJk007748@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<cc7177a5-b28f-4bf6-b29b-02f27bce66c1@googlegroups.com>
	(djgpp AT delorie DOT com)
Subject:	Re: LD from binutils 2.26 crashes when -ffunction-sections +
	-Wl,--gc-sections is used but only under DOS
References:	<e5d46af2-36fb-46af-af04-805ce2f8b6c3 AT googlegroups DOT com> <579167F3 DOT 4060700 AT gmx DOT de> <cc7177a5-b28f-4bf6-b29b-02f27bce66c1 AT googlegroups DOT com>
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Last I checked, DJ was still the COFF maintainer.

Or at least the DJGPP COFF maintainer.

> But it's not truly fair to expect him to do any heavy (or really
> any) maintenance as he has other priorities. So if he doesn't want
> to do it, we have to respect his decision.

Frankly, it's been so long since I've needed to touch that code, that
I've forgotten what's in it.  Once DOS stopped changing (i.e. no new
releases ;) there was little need to change the DOS linker.

> Cygwin and MinGW are still "tier two" while DJGPP isn't even on the
> map.  Maybe they throw us a bone every so often, I dunno, but DJGPP
> overall is not important enough (anymore), sadly.

It's important to the people who want it to be important.  You don't
need someone else's permission to care about it or work on it, you
just do it.  I started DJGPP because *I* wanted it, and I didn't have
to wait for someone else to decide it was important...

> I know none of this is giving much hope, but anyways ....

There's always hope, as long as someone wants there to be :-)

- Raw text -