delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2015/08/29/12:24:44

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 release candidate
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <201506091634 DOT t59GY0Bk000493 AT delorie DOT com>
<55E17D7D DOT 4030406 AT gmx DOT de> <55E1891C DOT 1070303 AT iki DOT fi>
<a136ae5a-33ba-434b-9f69-290e6638eeb7 AT googlegroups DOT com>
From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <55E1DCBA.4010103@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:24:26 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a136ae5a-33ba-434b-9f69-290e6638eeb7@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 08/29/2015 03:46 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Am Samstag, 29. August 2015 12:27:59 UTC+2 schrieb Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
>> On 08/29/2015 12:38 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> [snip]
>> About GCC versions:
>> - 3.4.6, 4.7.4, 4.8.5, 4.9.3 and 5.2.0 should be in new current directory (that includes also
>> gpc-3.4.6)
>> All gcc builds older than from this year can go to ftp/deleted/...
>>
>> GMP, MPFR and MPC - perhaps only newest version should be kept
>>
>> I should also sometimes build binutils-2.25 RPMs for /pub/ftp/rpms
>>
>> Andris
>
> OFYI, this is the list of compilers that the script would hace copied to /current:
> gcc323, gcc336, gcc346
> gcc401, gcc412, gcc423, gcc432, gcc444, gcc453, gcc464, gcc474, gcc485, gcc493
> gcc510, gcc520
>
> gpc323, gpc346
>
> Of course, gcc means all (ada*, gfor*, etc).  If all these versions are still
> required needs to be decide by someone else.
>
>
gcc-3.2.3, gcc-3.3.6 - do not copy
gpc-3.2.3 - do not copy

gcc-3.4.6 - copy
gpc-3.4.6 - copy

gcc-4.X.Y where X < 7 - do not copyopy

gcc-4.7.4, gcc-4.8.5, gcc-4.9.3 - to new current

gcc-5.2.0 - to new current

gcc-5.1.0 - no one has complained about regressions against it for gcc-5.2.0. . And it is not 
removed irrecoverably, so let's leave it out

Andris

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019