X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.224.53.198 with SMTP id n6mr5696689qag.2.1369968741424;
	Thu, 30 May 2013 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.49.107.234 with SMTP id hf10mr883530qeb.21.1369968741359;
	Thu, 30 May 2013 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<b643cc22-d2d1-4e78-b565-23ef699167b6@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.45.215.137;
	posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp
NNTP-Posting-Host:	78.45.215.137
References:	<1137560452 DOT 398133 DOT 301490 AT g14g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<0ed77a97-aec8-4fde-8124-707ca9cffad1 AT googlegroups DOT com> <28c2ff16-6cef-46c3-8f52-f67b320b5c04 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<de2dnU5WsKrWXQPMnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d AT earthlink DOT com> <68c3dec5-8fd4-4eb0-888d-3949d879a33c AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<90dceebd-8d81-4433-8932-9bce42bddb97 AT googlegroups DOT com> <95489b27-4b13-43e8-bf37-2b05561151d0 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<7dc5c757-671c-441e-92a5-f0a421d180e9 AT googlegroups DOT com> <5c52a006-7e14-48e3-b270-ca54db3a1c0c AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<b643cc22-d2d1-4e78-b565-23ef699167b6 AT googlegroups DOT com>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<375c59b7-6ec5-4a39-b968-c480d31e8124@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: Adding 64-bit file support to DJGPP
From:	RayeR <glaux AT centrum DOT cz>
Injection-Date:	Fri, 31 May 2013 02:52:21 +0000
Bytes:	2376
Lines:	9
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r4V3F2R3013774
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Well good it's not dead but did they opened sources of latest version? Yes useland seems to be confusing. Also partition manager is confusing for me.
I'm still not clear about running the DOS (16bit) there. You wrote that VTX simiar to V86 but supports multiple 32b / 64b guests (no mention abou 16b). Then there's about VMM that is 32b and does some BIOS and 16b emulation to allow run DOS. So is this 32b VMM using hardware V86 mode or VTX instructions or does it sw emulated? And hypervison microkernel itself runs in 32b or 64b mode? 
BTW Michal Sojka looks like Czech name, maybe I could find him and ask if he still involved in the project...

- Raw text -