X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2012 23:19:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991215144817.20509A-100000@is>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=216.113.168.130;
	posting-account=eAPBEQoAAABmdAnwbvZ6PeDp9BnSizbB
NNTP-Posting-Host:	216.113.168.130
References:	<385767A2 DOT 18A4FAAD AT earthlink DOT net> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991215144817 DOT 20509A-100000 AT is>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<8e5b70dc-67e5-43dd-8787-cf1305b573b4@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: is 'ld --wrap' not for C++?
From:	narensingh AT gmail DOT com
Cc:	Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Injection-Date:	Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:19:59 +0000
Bytes:	2107
Lines:	19
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wednesday, December 15, 1999 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Martin Ambuhl wrote:
> 
> > Alexey Zakhlestine wrote:
> > > 
> > > Well.... astually AFAIK "free" and "malloc" are C-routines.... not C++
> > > 
> > > In C++ you should use new/delete
> > 
> > It may be preferable in most cases to use new and delete in C++, that
> > first line has an extremely foul taste.
> 
> I don't think this is an issue in this case.  malloc should not be used 
> in C++ application code, but I'm guesing that new and delete call malloc 
> and free internally.  What the user who started this thread was trying to 
> do is to wrap malloc and free with user-defined wrappers, to be able to 
> watch memory allocation, presumably for debugging.  Thus, the reference 
> to malloc and free in this case is justified.

name mangling might be the issue

- Raw text -