X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=XB/zg29sAZR+hdUmU/j0/A86+LTWcQgac1fN4RLbAI4=;
	b=E2rmg46/NzyIPU5+mKnb52b9MIIog2h4jmu5WNDFF1eDWKVDlkpWLH5FUVjjTtRryE
	2ufGlC1NrPnXV2AE19IKO9ddhIDcvzg2ShcEATGUaiREEdR8mxn/PSYSz5VoI4nTVSfC
	sBmlCOd9meGNP4GUMAMCq9te6eFsFtH6eWQdg=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<bed1375f-86d0-4ea8-9012-7f33b3912981@m11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
References:	<7175606 DOT QEjTKyN9ct AT harm>
	<bed1375f-86d0-4ea8-9012-7f33b3912981 AT m11g2000yqe DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:34:55 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vDCGUJbPquNuOpv3VKLYKwwxTuVH2ZC=i+Z7L57Hno9_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: NASM and older Linux kernel versions
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q0L6Z3jN027179
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jan 20, 1:18 pm, John Wright <j DOT  DOT  DOT  AT wacontrols DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> I know this is not a DJGPP topic but it is related in my effort to learn what
>> you can and can't do.
>>
>> I have asked this question in the NASM forum but no response yet. I tried to
>> install NASM on a RedHat 5.2 release with kernel 2.0.36-0.5. "make" returned
>> with some GLIBC errors. Is this a matter of updating binutils to satisfy the
>> dependencies that it is looking for?  Or is this even possible for a Linux
>> version this old? Is there a cut-off kernel version?
>>
>> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> So you're trying to compile NASM for an old Linux kernel? Which GCC +
> BinUtils are you using? NASM 0.98.39 and older were ANSI C89, but
> newer requires C99. You could also try YASM (C89), but it lacks OMF/
> OBJ support (as does FASM).
>
> Actually, I had very briefly (tested only with one source) tried FASM
> on an old Linux (tomsrtbt), and it worked, so you could try that. The
> advantage there is that it assembles itself.
>
> I don't think BinUtils matters much here, but you should use an
> appropriate version with your GCC. Libc5 is probably what you're using
> as this is a quite old Linux. Actually, perhaps you can cross-compile
> a Linux version with OpenWatcom, and just run that. It should work,
> even for latest NASM releases, esp. since they link statically.
>

He says glibc-2.0, and anyone might be more helpful if the errors
were shown here.

--
O.S.

- Raw text -