X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 23 May 2009 16:45:26 +0300
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Python, Perl, Lua, Ruby -- anybody??
In-reply-to:	<87my94dp2z.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
X-012-Sender:	halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<83bppkszk9.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<c803f64c-6121-4b52-a2f0-b8a168f2d0d4 AT n8g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <7705c9030905132340u49a2fd15ke564b9ce930c09db AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <61f9fc90-2d0d-4db9-baa0-0a26ef663ce3 AT g20g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 60 DOT 0905171746200 DOT 30782 AT dynamite DOT narpes DOT com> <8ea89a75-ac4b-4235-b372-b7a8ffc51945 AT z19g2000vbz DOT googlegroups DOT com> <87my94dp2z DOT fsf AT uwakimon DOT sk DOT tsukuba DOT ac DOT jp>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull AT sk DOT tsukuba DOT ac DOT jp>
> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 20:40:52 +0900
> 
> Note that that was an *example* of how you could change the algorithm
> to make legal defense easier, but it's a very prominent one.  This
> implementation strategy is used in several prominent GNU tools (eg,
> Emacs, which is stupid, 'cause no judge would ever mistake Emacs for a
> Microsoft product -- unless of course the Microsoft lawyers managed to
> exclude everything but the output of ps from evidence!)

I think the _real_ danger RMS was thinking about wrt Emacs was not
from MS lawyers, but MIT lawyers.  See the GNU Manifesto for more
details.

- Raw text -