X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Which editor do you use?
Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<0fc1d4fd-3455-407c-80d1-6941274bf715@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References:	<f1018f14-b049-48d5-90a6-1cee94bd7ca7 AT z9g2000yqi DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<49D546DE DOT D1460450 AT yahoo DOT com> <200904030001 DOT n3301HH9008669 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<3fd01b0f-0329-4281-9ce1-2c39e63793b4 AT a7g2000yqk DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<200904031405 DOT n33E5BMl032598 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <4156dcd5-92d2-4810-bdac-46d297433692 AT w9g2000yqa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<200904031851 DOT n33Ip6Uk007193 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <048bd2cd-6724-4c12-88c4-a5c25c96d1b9 AT h28g2000yqd DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<200904031916 DOT n33JGm36007797 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	65.13.115.246
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1238787463 16695 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2009 19:37:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:37:43 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246;
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U; en) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Apr 3, 2:16=A0pm, DJ Delorie <d DOT  DOT  DOT  AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> > So you never use multiple undo or folding or spell checking or
> > omnicomplete or GCC error catching or syntax highlighting or
> > multiple windows or filename completion and only edit 7-bit text?
>
> Well, syntax highlighting just happens, I don't "use" it. =A0Otherwise,
> no, I don't use any of that stuff

You must use ":!ls" and ":e#" a lot then.

> that's what emacs is for.

Then why not just use Viper mode within Emacs? There must be a
reason!   :-)

- Raw text -