X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	=?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWC?= <newsgroup AT limcore DOT com DOT invalid>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Modern c++, c++0x (g++ 4.4 and above) in DJGPP
Date:	Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:11:41 +0200
Organization:	limcore.com
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<g6g43g$sdk$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
References:	<g6eusv$19e$1 AT inews DOT gazeta DOT pl> <92187018-bd11-41d0-a2ff-b7c7135393b8 AT z66g2000hsc DOT googlegroups DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	aaiz110.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	inews.gazeta.pl 1217106864 29108 83.4.233.110 (26 Jul 2008 21:14:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT agora DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:14:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-User:	lcnews
User-Agent:	KNode/0.10.9
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Rugxulo wrote:

> Also, C++0x isn't finalized yet (hence, the 'x'). So even if there is
> experimental support in GCC, I don't think most people (should?) use
> it yet, at least not for another year or so.

People are already writting in C++0x (using parts of C++0x that are working
in g++ 4.3, and some even this from 4.4)

> Modern C++ programs?? Such as what?? What exactly won't compile with G+
> + 4.2.3 which we already have and use?

http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html

Rvalue references are very interesting trick for example (too bad they dont
yet work fully)

And I can't wait for the "auto" variable (as in, auto-type variable, not the
old "auto" keyword).

- Raw text -