| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:35:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID: | <442AB47F.69CAE1BD@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:23:27 -0500 |
| From: | CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> |
| Organization: | Ched Research http://cbfalconer.home.att.net |
| X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) |
| X-Accept-Language: | en |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: gcc 4.10 thinks it is 5x faster than 4.01 |
| References: | <1143502002 DOT 445175 DOT 231640 AT v46g2000cwv DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
| <200603272333 DOT k2RNXBhk017059 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
| <1143539782 DOT 652312 DOT 229580 AT i39g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
| <442A1173 DOT 5D0E7E6D AT yahoo DOT com> <1143620233 DOT 822684 DOT 160640 AT g10g2000cwb DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
| Lines: | 29 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 216.204.220.72 |
| X-Trace: | sv3-IbNBk+xYRF9twjX+QGunWl+C/V5fje282GDMfYPVfcgGe2hZo0iDvyJK+0vtQIuyo9VlZnsgr6Z7Eex!xYAIjra4agbvKN5DsbuJs/odQDDHVzGKt+2HoHshAboRoTsZQY+un06tLqJ3m4KeiDvmm1kmKg== |
| X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT arcusdigital DOT com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To: | abuse AT arcusdigital DOT com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter: | 1.3.32 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Bob W wrote: > CBFalconer wrote: >> ... snip ... >> >> Most of us haven't any idea what you are talking about, so please >> include context. Google is not usenet, and there is no guarantee >> that any reader has read, will read, or will ever receive any >> previous posts. So make your article stand by itself. To do this >> on that poor excuse for a usenet interface that google offers, see >> my sig below and the referenced URLs. > > Sorry 'bout that! > > Thanks for your info. Congratulations on catching on rapidly. Now that you are providing context, you can also limit that context to the material you respond to, as I have done above. You are well on the way to becoming a civilized usenetter :-) -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |