X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	"arizvi" <ahmadwaris AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Problem with make: undefined reference to vtable
Date:	24 Jun 2005 12:21:59 -0700
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<1119640919.881671.6920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References:	<1119626620 DOT 773374 DOT 221740 AT g49g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<1119627784 DOT 991069 DOT 124850 AT g44g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<3i2t6hFjk29aU2 AT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	66.32.249.19
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1119640926 25216 127.0.0.1 (24 Jun 2005 19:22:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:22:06 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	G2/0.2
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.32.249.19;
	posting-account=Se-Idg0AAAC00LEpjdiQS7ZeyWGDYpCA
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> > Instead of:
>
> > ./test_view.o:: test_view.cpp infoDialog.cpp
>
> > I had:
>
> > ./test_view.o:: infoDialog.cpp test_view.cpp
>
> Those are both equally wrong.  This rule can only make sense if you
> #include one .cpp file into the other.  Don't do that.  Compile each
> separately, and leave it to the linker to combine them.
>

I dont understand how both rules are wrong. Afaik, the top rule states
that test_view.o depends on test_view.cpp and infoDialog.cpp. So if
infoDialog.cpp changes, test_view.cpp will be recompiled. What you are
suggesting (let me know if I am wrong) is that the rules should be
simply

./test_view.o:: test_view.cpp
./infoDialog.o:: infoDialog.cpp,

and then I lose the dependency I am looking for. Or are you implying
that if I include infoDialog.h in test_view.cpp, I will get the
dependency automatically?

I have certainly no wish to 'include' one cpp file in another. I am
only want to link them together. The rule
'./test_view.o:: test_view.cpp infoDialog.cpp' is only a dependency.
Please let me know if I am wrong.

-Ahmad

- Raw text -