delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2005/01/14/12:01:18

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "News Reader" <nospam AT aol DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: RSXDJ
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 03:48:07 +1100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <41e7f7ce$0$24458$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.49.206.40
X-Trace: 1105721294 24458 210.49.206.40
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Is anyone out there still using RSXDJ?
If yes, please give me your thoughts.

I guess Mingw or Cygwin are the de-facto
standards for gcc on Windows systems
now. But I like the fact that DJGPP is always
much faster to have the the newest gcc
versions implemented.

What makes me suspicious, however, are
rumors that RSXDJ is buggy and development
has aparently ceased in 1999. This is not a
good match to the otherwise very mature
DJGPP system.

So would you guys advise me to stay
away from RSXDJ or would you recommend
to give it a try if Win32 features are kept
as simple as possible?

I'd anyway use VC++ for more sophisticated
Windows programs. But I don't like the idea
that the 2003 VC++ version seems to lack
some C99 features. Maybe they'll have that
fixed in their 2005 version?

Thanks.


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019