X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:09:45 -0200
From:	Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon AT kymatica DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Shared libraries?
Message-Id:	<20050111010945.57278946.lijon@kymatica.com>
In-Reply-To:	<01c4f5be$Blat.v2.2.2$21b025c0@zahav.net.il>
References:	<BBVDd.54479$nP1 DOT 21957 AT twister DOT socal DOT rr DOT com>
	<01c4f5be$Blat.v2.2.2$21b025c0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
Organization:	Kymatica
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:09:40 +0200
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:

> > From: "Samuel Lauber" <sam124 AT operamail DOT com>
>  > Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:26:41 GMT
>  > 
>  > COFF has supported shared libraries for a LONG time. I think DJGPP
>  > should have shared library support.
> 
>  What for?  There could be only one DJGPP process running in each VM,
>  so the principal benefit of shared libraries--sharing code across
>  multiple executables--does not exist.  And with the ridiculously low
>  costs of today's disks, the size of the executable on disk doesn't
>  matter much anymore.

I see another use of shared libraries, the ability to add or change code
to a program without having to relink it, so called "plugins"... (I'd
personally like that very much for my compositional environment, I'm
planning to try out Stonewheel for this)
 
/Jonatan    -=( http://kymatica.com )=-

- Raw text -