delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/12/19/11:16:57

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Radical NetSurfer <RadSurfer AT yahoo DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: PLEASE EXPLAIN v2.953
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:07:17 -0500
Message-ID: <ni9bs09vhmlefb5h3djvjr9b147vt9jf4e@4ax.com>
References: <4tg7s0182f12t4dlbri2pdq2uqq6ausos7 AT 4ax DOT com> <32jv9hF3ldm8cU4 AT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Organization: Velocity.Net
Cache-Post-Path: web.velocity.net!unknown AT 66-211-204-75 DOT velocity DOT net
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Lines: 43
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT newshosting DOT com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Since you are up on this, PLEASE explain why the

%U  and %D mentioned in libc.txt (or libc.info)
when it is actually flagged as a non-existing entity...

What is/was the purpose of %D, %U ?

What I did was to attempt to convert those *.info
files into a more useful *.txt files (that was done long ago),
ALL material is in there, but apparently there are also high-bit
characters present as well and my eye is over-trained to ignore
areas of "garbage", which is why I missed what I needed.

'h', 'l', etc., are indeed mentioned!


On 19 Dec 2004 00:11:29 GMT, Hans-Bernhard Broeker
<broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote:

>Radical NetSurfer <RadSurfer AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
>
>[... much snipped ...]
>
>> What is this indicating?
>
>To put it bluntly: it indicates that you haven't read the fine manual
>on printf() with sufficient attention yet.  Please do so immediately.
>
>> %ld works, but get this, according to  'libc.txt' which describes the
>> library functions (by category, etc.) and looking at  
>>    printf
>
>There is no 'libc.txt' that is supposed to document the details of
>DJGPP's implementation of printf().  The main documentation is libc.info.
>
>> there is *NO* sign of &h,  no sign of 'l' as a long modifier,
>
>Huh?  What's this, then (quoted straight from 'info libc alpha printf':
>
>   *  An optional conversion qualifier, which may be `h' to specify
>     `short', `l' to specify long ints, or `L' to specify long doubles.
>     Long long type can be specified by `L' or `ll'.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019