delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/10/23/17:15:35

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Jason Mills <jmills AT cs DOT mun DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Timer inside interrupt handler
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:45:42 -0230
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <clee5f$j5s$1@coranto.ucs.mun.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jmills.ccore.mun.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: coranto.ucs.mun.ca 1098562543 19644 134.153.38.195 (23 Oct 2004 20:15:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT coranto DOT ucs DOT mun DOT ca
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:15:43 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Does anyone have any suggestions as too what time functions
can be safely called inside an interrupt handler? I
need something with a resolution of > 80ms. Basically,
I need a time stamp of when the IRS is called.

I used uclock() originally, but I think it's causing
some problems in other parts of my code. I'm aware of the
other timing functions, but which one is "safest" to call
inside the ISR? Is there a better way to get a time stamp
inside an ISR then calling something like uclock().

Thanks,
Jason

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019