X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	"one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com" <one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: latest ls.exe version in XP problem
References:	<6jKbd.13476$nj DOT 4016 AT newssvr13 DOT news DOT prodigy DOT com> <416fec3d AT news DOT upm DOT es> <EsSbd.30793$QJ3 DOT 6857 AT newssvr21 DOT news DOT prodigy DOT com> <01c4b377$Blat.v2.2.2$bd9427e0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <pSgcd.31525$QJ3 DOT 30700 AT newssvr21 DOT news DOT prodigy DOT com> <01c4b404$Blat.v2.2.2$848b3140 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <qrKcd.15033$nj DOT 7239 AT newssvr13 DOT news DOT prodigy DOT com> <01c4b54b$Blat.v2.2.2$224c0ac0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
In-Reply-To:	<01c4b54b$Blat.v2.2.2$224c0ac0@zahav.net.il>
Lines:	46
Message-ID:	<ZjFdd.16714$nj.8541@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	69.110.163.208
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT prodigy DOT net
X-Trace:	newssvr13.news.prodigy.com 1098326393 ST000 69.110.163.208 (Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:39:53 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:39:53 EDT
Organization:	SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1:	SCSYASFGVBRUR^QSV AT CBNWX@RJ_XPDLMN AT GZ_GYO^RR AT ETUCCNSKQFCY@TXDX_WHSVB]ZEJLSNY\^J[CUVSA_QLFC^RQHUPH[P[NRWCCMLSNPOD_ESALHUK AT TDFUZHBLJ\XGKL^NXA\EVHSP[D_C^B_^JCX^W]CHBAX]POG AT SSAZQ\LE[DCNMUPG_VSC AT VJM
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:39:53 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>From: "one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com" <one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com>
>>Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:40:06 GMT
>>
>>Just based on what I observerd that "ls -F" takes 30 seconds or more to 
>>start to display something, while "ls" and "dir" has no such a problem.
> 
> 
> That's too long; I never saw such huge delays.  What files are in that

I run the command in an old computer.

> directory, mostly?

Just regular files and directories.

 > are there lots of large subdirectories or files
> with unusual file-name extensions?  

The file name extensions are normal. But why subdirecries matter here?
I don't have option "-R"

 >
Can you post what "ls -F" produces
> for that directory?


It just displays thousands of files under that directory.

I just noticed if using "dir", the displayed director or files will show 
the first page and pause for a second, then display the seoncd page. 
This way, it displayes thousands of files.
For ls -F, you will need to wait very long, 20 seconds or 30 seconds, 
and then it suddently display everything.

> 
>>with ls -F, if the object is a file, it displays the file name such as 
>>"xxxx", if it is a directory, it will display "xxxx/", if I have 20 
>>files in a directory, it will easily for me to find what I want either a 
>>file or a directory.
> 
> 
> Does "ls --color=auto" display faster?  If so, you could use that to
> get the same information from the color of the file names.

a little faster. Thanks.

- Raw text -