delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/09/22/10:31:04.1

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Cesar Rabak <crabak AT acm DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: bnu214s compiled for djgpp 2.04 alpha
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:29:48 -0300
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <41518C5C.1000306@acm.org>
References: <1095849299 DOT 415155532ce78 AT webmail DOT wilkes DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de ZdwP+XnOyaGOsa8NtFGIIwiq3z44kuiQ/u1EuDpPPE/jF0icY=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: pt-br, pt
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

fdonahoe AT wilkes DOT edu escreveu:
> Cesar Rabak on Tuesday, 21 September wrote:
> 
> 
>>Does the mpz_aorsmul_1 function definition starts on line 61 of 
>>aorsmul_i.c, or there is a 'void' in the previous line?
>>
>>If there is the 'void' in aorsmul_i.c, then could you please run:
>>
>>gcc -E aorsmul_i.c -o aorsmul_i.i
>>
>>and see how the declaration at line 628 expands?
> 
> 
>  ...> gcc -E -I. mpz/aorsmul_i.c -o aorsmul_i.i
> 
> Gives this for line 628
> 
> # 628 "./gmp-impl.h"
> void __gmpz_aorsmul_1 (mp_size_t sub,mpz_ptr w,mpz_srcptr u,mp_limb_t
> v) __attribute__ ((regparm (1)));
[snipped

> And for good measure, this for line 60
> 
> # 60 "mpz/aorsmul_i.c"
> void
> __gmpz_aorsmul_1 (mp_size_t sub,mpz_ptr w,mpz_srcptr x,mp_limb_t y)
> {
[snipped]

They don't look to have any clash between declaration and definition for 
me. Is there by any chance another declaration of __gmpz_aorsmul_1 that 
might be already in force (by a define or ifdef mechanism not tuned for 
the build)?

--
Cesar Rabak

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019