X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Message-ID:	<1ea101c4918e$6aa2e360$0600000a@broadpark.no>
From:	"Gisle Vanem" <giva AT bgnett DOT no>
To:	"djgpp" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<20040902144152 DOT GH6858 AT webhome DOT cz> <41376655 DOT 2A1807EC AT yahoo DOT com> <a4tej0ha3ogninujdhurgel3jcn0r441m2 AT 4ax DOT com> <200409022030 DOT i82KUYUY004665 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <41378AAC DOT 9060805 AT acm DOT org> <200409022141 DOT i82Lf3d9005713 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: scanf: strange behavior?
Date:	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:17:13 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> > Can I surmise the implementation choice at DJGPP was the '"correct"'?
> 
> I don't recall offhand if the current (or past) implementation in
> DJGPP was fully correct or not, but if it's different from glibc or
> borland, it's certainly not the "compatible" option ;-)

Hasn't anybody mentioned that sscanf() in djgpp 2.04 has a bug?
Don't know who reported it first, but I did here:
http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2004/03/27/06:45:38

So the OP uses 2.04 and sees the result of this bug? 
(since 2.03 produces the expected result).

It seems the bug has been fixed now (by Martin S.?) This
http://www.ludd.luth.se/~ams/djgpp/cvs/djgpp/src/libc/ansi/stdio/doscan.c

hash a timestamp of 3 Sep 2004. Good work.

--gv

- Raw text -