delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:41:03 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200409022141.i82Lf3d9005713@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <41378AAC.9060805@acm.org> (message from Cesar Rabak on Thu, 02 |
Sep 2004 18:03:40 -0300) | |
Subject: | Re: scanf: strange behavior? |
References: | <20040902144152 DOT GH6858 AT webhome DOT cz> <41376655 DOT 2A1807EC AT yahoo DOT com> <a4tej0ha3ogninujdhurgel3jcn0r441m2 AT 4ax DOT com> <200409022030 DOT i82KUYUY004665 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <41378AAC DOT 9060805 AT acm DOT org> |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Can I surmise the implementation choice at DJGPP was the '"correct"'? I don't recall offhand if the current (or past) implementation in DJGPP was fully correct or not, but if it's different from glibc or borland, it's certainly not the "compatible" option ;-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |