X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Raf256 <raf256 AT go2 DOT pl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Allegro, djgpp 3.02
Date:	3 Dec 2001 08:46:28 GMT
Organization:	aa
Lines:	25
Sender:	raf256 AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl@chello062179025129.chello.pl
Message-ID:	<Xns916C63FDD6E3Drfdfciasdsdj412tr@213.180.128.20>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1011202145332 DOT 9372C-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	chello062179025129.chello.pl
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.onet.pl 1007369188 17729 62.179.25.129 (3 Dec 2001 08:46:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT onet DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	3 Dec 2001 08:46:28 GMT
User-Agent:	Xnews/4.06.22
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote in
news:Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1011202145332 DOT 9372C-100000 AT is: 

>> 3. imho djgpp 3.02 build+complie time is much (50%) longer then 2.95,
>> is this true ? 
> Compiling C programs or C++ programs?

C++
 
> If you are talking about C programs, I see something like 30% slow-down
> in compilation speed.  I don't know about C++, but it won't surprise me
> if it were much slower, since it now supports a much larger language
> than before.

I installed GCC 3.02 and compiled simple hello world program, but with 2 
files, like a.cc calling void Hello();  and b.cc + b.h with void Hello() 
definition/declaration, imho building took more time then on GCC 2.95



-- 
Raf256
,--, _  ,-   _  _  _  ,---------------------------------------------,
|,-'`_|_|_  `_||_'|_' | raf256 AT go2 DOT pl
| `\|_| |   |_,,_||_| | 

- Raw text -