delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2003/08/26/11:03:58

From: "Fausto Arinos Barbuto" <fbarbuto2002 AT yahoo DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Question about RHIDE
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:34:04 -0600
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <bifr2j$8ej5l$1@ID-184581.news.uni-berlin.de>
References: <biea13$8dmfe$1 AT ID-184581 DOT news DOT uni-berlin DOT de> <opruicbnpr0bb83x AT news DOT mad DOT ttd DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cferd021.cfertech.com (128.144.90.21)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1061908371 8866997 128.144.90.21 (16 [184581])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Rafael García" <rafael AT geninfor DOT com> wrote in message:

> > I am trying to run a simple "Hello, World!" program from within
> > RHIDE, but am getting a "Program Exit Code: -1 (0xffffffff)" error
> > message. What could that be? Any hints?

> Perhaps your program does not return a value. ¿Is main a void function?
> It should not.  Put here your code

    No, "main" is "int main(void)". But I found out how to fix the problem.
    All I had to do was to remove old definitions such as LIB=C:\DJGPP\LIB
    and INCLUDE=C:\DJGPP\INCLUDE from the environment variable
    set. There was a C:\DJGPP\LIB inside the PATH definitions, which I
    mercilessly chopped off as well. I guess those exrta definitions and
    system variables were having the settings inside DJGPP.ENV confused.

    My code had nothing of special, it was just a 5-liner "Hello, World!"
    source (I can do better than that, believe me ;-) I built with the
purpose
    of testing RHIDE. And it compiled and ran quite well in command line
    mode (gcc -o hello.exe hello.c).

    I fixed things by comparing the existing environment variables and
settings
    on my office's computer (Win 2000), where RHIDE has always worked,
    with the ones I had on my home XP machine.

> > I am a Windows XP user and have used Borland C/C++ 3.1's
> > IDE in the past (long ago) and liked it a lot. RHIDE seems to be
> > a few order of magnitudes harder than Borland's IDE, though.

> I used BC too but RHIDE is a few order of magnitudes better for me :-)

    I beg to disagree, but maybe my opinion is totally biased. I used BC IDE
    for a long time but am a newbie when it comes to RHIDE. To be honest
    you I must say that I don't care about RHIDE, but since I had the GNU
    C/C++ package installed I wanted all of its pieces in good working
    condition.  ;-)

    Incidentally, I was told that old Borland 3.1's IDE does not work in XP.

Cheers,

---Fausto



- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019