From:	Andrew <andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: stat and character devices
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:03:51 +1000
Organization:	ECLiPSE
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<ga7jfv0tk254jg05c21ran3ligd9lrc96l@4ax.com>
References:	<bdbdie$im7$1 AT blue DOT rahul DOT net> <2950-Wed25Jun2003124946+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	p408-apx1.syd.ihug.com.au
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	lust.ihug.co.nz 1056546236 18959 203.173.141.154 (25 Jun 2003 13:03:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ihug DOT co DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:03:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>> I noticed that stat treats some character devices differently, depending
>> on whether it is run in a DOS box under Win98 or in plain DOS. The COM
>> series (com1, com2, etc.) shows as a character device when run under
>> plain DOS, but not in the DOS box under Win98.
>
>On my Windows 98 box, "ls -l com2" shows "com2" in yellow, which means
>`stat' did return the character-device bit set for it.  So I guess I
>cannot reproduce this here.
>
>> A test program that demonstrates this follows.
>
>You didn't show the results of running this program on Windows 98.
>Here are mine:
>
>    The value of base is com1
>    The value of st_dev is -1.
>    The value of st_mode is 8612.
>    The file is a character device.
>
>Exactly as I'd expect.
>
>So I guess more digging is required.
Could the differences be caused by the 2.03 v's 2.04 alpha 1
differences? 

Andrew

- Raw text -