From:	alrc AT task DOT com DOT br (Andre Chrcanovic)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gprof with all zero execution times in version 2.03
Date:	13 May 2003 07:08:23 -0700
Organization:	http://groups.google.com/
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<5c9be5c2.0305130608.3d3661ef@posting.google.com>
References:	<200305121929 DOT h4CJTEN08938 AT delorie DOT com> <b9qegc$b4g$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	200.165.11.92
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1052834904 15188 127.0.0.1 (13 May 2003 14:08:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	13 May 2003 14:08:24 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I got this output sample after running the program for approximately
45 minutes, not 0.28 seconds...

eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg) wrote in message news:<b9qegc$b4g$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>...
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?alrc AT task=2Ecom=2Ebr?= (alrc AT task DOT com DOT br) wrote:
> : Flat profile:
>  
> : Each sample counts as 0.0555556 seconds.
> :   %   cumulative   self              self     total           
> :  time   seconds   seconds    calls  Ts/call  Ts/call  name    
> : 100.00      0.28     0.28                             __dpmi_int
> :   0.00      0.28     0.00  7382040     0.00     0.00  crc_inc
> :   0.00      0.28     0.00    13368     0.00     0.00  led_boot_blink
> :   0.00      0.28     0.00     1213     0.00     0.00  led_reserva
> :   0.00      0.28     0.00      667     0.00     0.00  incrementa_instante_atual
> :   0.00      0.28     0.00      104     0.00     0.00  enfilera
>  
> : Does anyone have an idea about what is going on here?
> 
> If I read that right, your program executed for ~0.28 seconds with
> 0.28/0.0555556 = 5 samples. I guess that's not many enough to get a
> good coverage.
> 
> Try running the program a longer time somehow (more data, slower
> computer).
> 
> 
> Right,
> 
> 						MartinS

- Raw text -