Message-ID:	<3E695102.A3C7FD22@yahoo.com>
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Compiling GRX 245
References:	<002101c2e3fc$181e0700$0300a8c0 AT rivasaiicfa DOT com DOT ar> <b47tt5$ep5$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <3E67AEC5 DOT 9AF3CA27 AT yahoo DOT com> <200303062110 DOT h26LAJD32316 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3E6879B8 DOT 92765D5A AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3e68f75a DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Lines:	18
Date:	Sat, 08 Mar 2003 02:33:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	12.90.174.131
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace:	bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1047090819 12.90.174.131 (Sat, 08 Mar 2003 02:33:39 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sat, 08 Mar 2003 02:33:39 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
> > > IIRC we fixed the header file in the 2.03 update.
> > Yes, it was fixed in DJGPP 2.03 refresh 2.
> 
> The differences between refresh 1 and refresh 2 are in:
> http://clio.rice.edu/djgpp/v203u2/djdev203_u2.zip

This is all academic, but the only thing in that that could be
applicable is readme.1st, which is dated 2002-3-5, and has no list
of changes, etc.  The only point I am making is that the OP did
not have much of a chance.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -